0
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ghosthand@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

It sucks, but this sub now may have to consider changing it's name to workreform because of this. Plus workreform is a much better description of the movement.

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Someone please shoot that Fox news bastard in the knees and balls

[-] nromdotcom@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Honestly, like fuck Fox News and that dude was just a smug asshole. But at the same time, is he really the one at fault for fucking up that interview?

If this mod were being interviewed by anyone that wasn't already deeply sympathetic to the community were conducting that interview would it really have gone any differently?

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 0 points 2 years ago

Ouch. The questions were not even hardballs. When the interviewer stated that the system is fair because one freely agrees to the company's terms and conditions of employment, I would have been the one laughing. If "starving" is the alternative then perhaps the bargaining power of the employers is a bit unbalanced.

But I don't judge the guy. He must have been tripping on nerves. It would have been a good idea to pick someone a bit more prepared to face this kind of pressure. But hey, he was brave. Maybe they got the opportunity with short notice and no one else was willing to step up.

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

that's the kind of shit they do if you get on tv, you need to be super violent and aggressive if you want them to take you just a bit serious

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2022
0 points (50.0% liked)

Antiwork

7692 readers
4 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS