this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
-28 points (15.0% liked)

California

1463 readers
11 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So I checked the article and the source they based their article on, but neither provides any details nor studies that show any damage. It's all speculation, since juveniles won't even be back to the region until 2025.

It also claims that majority of people were against it, while it's the opposite. Majority asked for them to be removed for years. Native American tribes in particular even had a long protests asking for them to be destroyed since fishing is a big part of living. Commercial fishing was even closed last year due to lack of fish.

The most stupid point is about algae though. The only reason there is algae in that water is the dams... The blocking of fresh water created the perfect conditions for algae.

[–] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Author knows zero about fisheries biology and the process (and timeline) of dam removal and habitat restoration.