this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
182 points (97.4% liked)

Work Reform

9797 readers
143 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That would require the job websites to 1. care and 2. have staff to handle the reports

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

I know how we can solve #2...

Career Listing Integrity Officer

Monster

United States (Remote)

$15-$16/hr - no benefits

NOTE: This role requires you to be onsite, only local candidates will be considered for the role.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

They benefit from bait and switch tactics. Hence not having it.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

If job seekers were the customer and not the product for these sites, something like that might get implemented.

[–] caesaravgvstvs@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

When applying to a job now I tell them I'm willing to relocate and only later disclose that I would do it after the probation period