this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
1520 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

5452 readers
2947 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pizza_Rat@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

One major factor: women entered the workforce. Labor supply doubled, and two incomes per household became normalized. Our current economic system fails to account for the work of raising children which was implicitely built into the "traditional family" model.

That's a double whammy for workers. The value of labor is halved. Both partners are expected to work to achieve a similar standard of living. And, without one partner doing household and child-rearing labor, those costs are borne by the workers.

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Cite your sources on this economic theory of yours, that is if you can find any that didn't come out of some MRA's ass

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Obviously women should have the same labor opportunities as men, but do you really think doubling the pool of workers would have no impact on the labor market?

It only becomes MRA bullshit when you stop there and say "see, feminism was a mistake!" instead of arguing for all workers to be better compensated.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 0 points 8 months ago

What part do you disagree with?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It wasn’t stolen as much as we willingly gave it up for modern convenience such as letting women work outside the home, prioritizing single family housing and car ownership in the suburbs, cutting taxes for the ultra wealthy and a plethora of other choices we made 70 years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doof@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

I get the point they are making but using 5 was stupid. There was never a time when any salary worker would be able to support a family of 5. This is unnecessary hyperbole.

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Me, an intellectual, who makes less than the American minimum wage because I live in a third world country: You guys can't make ends meet with your inflated s Dollar salaries? 🧐

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SebKra@feddit.de -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For any country that has benefited from exploitation of foreign resources "stolen" is a bit rich.

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago

So all nations?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›