1873
Eat the rich (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago by Lazylazycat@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HandOfDoom@lemmy.world 162 points 11 months ago

While I agree that we have a duty to avoid unethical brands whenever possible, there's just no way to escape them all. I live in a poor country and I there's a lot of "bad stuff" I have to buy just because it's what I can affford at the moment.

There is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

[-] TheSaneWriter@lemm.ee 45 points 11 months ago

Fully agreed. While it is morally positive to avoid especially unethical companies, ultimately it's not possible in all cases. As long as you try to be moral in your day to day actions and you on some level push for things to be better, you're not morally culpable for the failings of the current system.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 24 points 11 months ago

This is true... but with some corporations it's just a case of "fuck you in particular."

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

Avoiding every company that does something unethical is impossible. Imo, avoiding giving money directly to those unethical practices is what we should strive for.

Ie, Nestle is notorious for the way it acquires and sells bottled water, using legal loopholes to leave communities without drinkable water, and adding sodium to their water to keep you thirsty and drink more. So don't buy their water. Assuming enough people do so, the company will, inevitably, stop selling water and focus on products that are selling. Does Nestle as a whole deserve to fuck off? I mean, sure, but, at the very least, we can pressure companies to only engage with the practices that we consider passable.

I avoid Nestle, because fuck their water shit, I don't trust them to source cocoa reasonably either, and they are nowhere near having a monopoly on good chocolate, so they're perhaps a bad example. But we can at least push companies around, because ultimately, the only thing they give a shot about is our money.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Sure for sure. And I'm tired of people treating it like it's all or nothing, OR that it is stupid to boycott! I have my reasons why I refuse to purchase from this brand specifically and not others. We all only have so much energy (and money, mental resources etc) to be able to do so much. Let's not shit on others for trying, or others who don't want to. Maybe their energy is spent on other injustices and boycotts. Or just trying to survive. I dont like that they steal water from drought stricken communities here in America, and what they did in Africa. I have the mental resources and the luxury to boycott them so I do. You don't so you don't.

The only jerks are the ones who literally don't care because it has nothing to do with them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] vd1n@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's when you have to ask yourself if you're ready for war. I've been stalked by drug dealers that want me to keep my mouth shut. It's all the same business minded bs mainstream or street. A heartless man is a heartless man no matter what.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 86 points 11 months ago
[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 53 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Don't get me wrong, fuck nestle, but this whole movement that's grown singling them out is so superficial it really frustrates me.
All of the companies of nestle's size are up to the exact same shit. They all exploit their employees, destroy the planet, and invest millions if not billions in union busting and lobbying.
I get that it's easier just to focus on one company, but if you want one thing to focus on, make it capitalism, the system that enables, hell, encourages, this shit, rather than individual products of it.
Even if the movement somehow managed to destroy nestle (never going to happen), destroying one company achieves nothing. Tear the whole thing down.

[-] SuperLogica@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

The Nestle boycott wasn’t founded due to exploitation of employees, unions, etc. They’re shitty and do all that stuff (and far more). But the boycott was specifically founded (in the 1970s) due to their decision to relentlessly market baby formula to vulnerable mothers, particularly in less developed countries, often in times of famine or hardship. They knowingly caused health problems in infants (who of course then grew into adults with health problems), probably caused many infant deaths, and pushed families into poverty (with all the consequences of that), for profit. 50 years later we’re still dealing with the consequences of their immoral marketing (which has never really stopped, they just change the messaging in order to comply with relevant laws, which are too weak).

I’d boycott them just for that, but they’re also the corporation who in both U.S. and European hearings has argued that water isn’t a human right and pushed to privatise community resources, at a time when water scarcity is one of the main long-term threats to many countries, including the U.S. and many European countries.

Other companies do this stuff too, but generally speaking they’ve done it for less time and are less brazen about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Agreed. Fuck billionaires, fuck capitalism.

[-] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

While I understand your perspective, you failed to mention their actions which specifically targeted new mothers in developing countries with unethical actions that resulted in the slow deaths of infants.

This is why I boycott Nestlé. Not poor treatment of employees, nor a disregard for the environment.

Nestlé implemented a plan that caused babies to die a slow and painful death while their mothers could only watch helplessly.

Fuck Nestlé.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Nestl%C3%A9_boycott

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Since you've both missed the point entirely in favour of the same example (that is absolutely not unique to nestle), I'll just copy paste my reply:

I am well aware of all of that information, and if you think others are less brazen, you've simply not been paying attention. Either way, you seem to have missed the point. Boycott them. But don't think that'll affect any change, because it won't.

[-] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

My goal was to say what some of their more egregious acts. I would hate for people to forget that Nestlé caused the slow painful death of infants because it was grouped in with general corporate behaviors.

I'm also aware of other atrocities performed by companies; the Banana Massacre by Chaquita (then United Fruit Company), Ford letting their customers burn to death instead of adding an $11 safety feature to the Ford Pinto, Apple using state sanctioned slave labor through Foxconn, etc etc. And when I get the chance, I share those acts of corporate malevolence.

I'm not excusing any of them. I'm just doing what I can to help prevent these acts from being forgotten.

For me, boycotting and / or protesting this behavior is not about changing the collective minds or behaviors of corporations. It's about not accepting it and expressing personal outrage, even if it is commonplace.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For me, boycotting and / or protesting this behavior is not about changing the collective minds or behaviors of corporations. It’s about not accepting it and expressing personal outrage, even if it is commonplace.

And that right there is the problem, because if you're not looking to change things, what's the point? Outrage without action is not only futile, but it's exactly what those at the top are counting on - for people to waste their time and energy on pointless boycotts that make them feel like they're helping, while their machine chugs on uninterrupted. It's a distraction, and it's working.

Remembering, and reminding others of these atrocities is hollow if you don't aim to destroy the system that enabled them in the first place (and which will continue to enable them, and others, to continue to do more, worse, atrocities, because capitalism isn't getting any fucking friendlier or easier going on the working class).

So again - boycott whoever you want it if it makes you feel better, I boycott companies for all sorts of reasons, but don't delude yourself in to thinking that is going to change anything on any level beyond your own personal feelings, because it won't.

[-] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

What actions do you suggest? I am open to suggestions.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Join/create a union. Join/create a Food not Bombs. Actually invest your time reading up on socialism, anarchism, and becoming an anti capitalist in the way that personally suits you best, as well as what suits your community best, instead of expecting others to spoon feed you instructions.

I'm not trying to be an ass but I literally know nothing about you, where you are and what your local community needs, what your able and not to do, how much trouble you're willing to get in to or how much time and resources you have to spare, and a whole load more variables that mean I couldn't possibly tell you what to do or how.

Look up solidarity, look up dual power, look up building a community, take your own steps at your own pace.

Or don't.

All I'm saying is don't delude yourself (or others) in to thinking a boycott of a single company (or even all of them, but nothing beyond) is having any impact on anyone but you.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TrenchcoatFullofBats@belfry.rip 29 points 11 months ago

Fun fact 1: That is Hayao Miyazaki of Studio Ghibli

Fun Fact 2: KitKat in Japan is made by Nestle, so he probably would be disappointed to find out that his KitKat is made by Nestle

[-] BraBraBra@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Not so fun fact:

He's a bit of a dick.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Meh. He's a creative type with a high work standard. He's also pro socialism and sympathetic to workers.

Edit: citation https://walessince1945.wordpress.com/2020/11/11/hayao-miyazaki-the-miners-strike-and-wales/

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] famousringo@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 months ago

Shouldn’t be hard, as almost everything Nestle makes tastes like crap.

[-] SuperLogica@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Maybe stop eating shampoo then. (= They partly own L’Oréal, and by extension all the L’Oréal brands: Garnier, Maybelline, Vichy, Biotherm, etc.)

To your actual point though: A) that depends on which country you live in, given that their products are manufactured differently in each country/region. B) it does also depend on what brand you’re referring to. I find it highly unlikely you dislike EVERYTHING in the Nestle machine. Hot Pockets? Perrier water? Nerds? Smarties??

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] atyaz@reddthat.com 4 points 11 months ago

Well that's subjective, but I see your point, there are definitely much higher quality products out there. But if you grew up with some of their products, there is the nostalgia factor, plus if you can't afford the higher quality products, you are still going to buy nestle products. You could say they have us by the balls.

[-] Nesquik@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago

I was given my alias at 8yo so I was ignorant at the time drinking nesquik everyday.

Fuck nestle.

[-] Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago

I don't hold it against you. You're a victim in this!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FarFarAway@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Definitely.

Obligatory, fuck nestle!

[-] vector@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Speaking of which, have the hydrohomies migrated already?

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 months ago

If any of ya'll have some KitKat alternatives I'm listening. Currently enjoying Kinder Bueno but am ready for something else.

[-] sarsaparilyptus@lemmy.fmhy.ml 21 points 11 months ago

American Kit Kats are made by the Hershey company and no money goes to Nestlé.

Explanation:
Kit Kat used to be a Rowntree's product, and Hershey bought the right to make the candy in the U.S. in perpetuity back in 1970. When Nestlé bought Rowtree's, they had to abide by the contract to license out the Kit Kat for no royalties, because the only condition of the agreement is that Hershey loses the license if the company ever gets sold. And since selling the Kit Kat bar is so valuable, buying Hershey for what it's currently worth would mean instantly losing a large amount of Hershey's value, so even when they've tried to find a buyer, nobody will buy the company—even Nestlé refused to buy Hershey in 2002.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fester@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

If you’re in the US, KitKat here is made by Hershey.

But look at Nature Valley “Chocolate Peanut Butter Wafer Bars.” As someone who likes both, they’re not the same - they’re better, as long as you like peanut butter.

[-] ProvokedGamer@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

What about Canada? Is KitKat made by Nestle here?

[-] Tak@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

If it makes you feel better Hershey's is also fucking atrocious and the cacao they source is likely also from child labor in Africa.

[-] datatitian@social.coop 8 points 11 months ago

@Tak @ProvokedGamer
Not just likely - actual survivors of Nestle's child slavery operation came to the US for help, and the supreme court, including all 3 "liberal" justices, told them to get fucked and that it's perfectly legal for US companies to use child slave labor as long as it happens outside the US

https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/justices-scuttle-lawsuit-against-nestle-cargill-for-allegedly-aiding-child-slavery-abroad/

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Looks like it, unfortunately.

They also make Coffee Crisp, which is a shame, as I used to stock up on them whenever I visited.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snarf@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

If you are in the United States, you are giving your money to Hershey for Kit Kat; it is licensed from Nestlé based on a previous deal with the original owner of the brand. I don't know the exact details of the contract, but it appears that it was a lump sum payment which means no money goes to Nestlé for Kit Kat sales in the US.

Still, Hershey is not much better, and this factoid is irrelevant if you are NOT buying the US version. Similar options include Tim Tam, Double Time, Dido, Trader Joe's Wafer Cookie, Milka Leo or Choco Wafer, Little Secrets Crispy Wafers, and any number of other generic chocolate wafers. You can also make your own: https://www.inthekitchenwithmatt.com/homemade-kit-kats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NekoKamiGuru@ttrpg.network 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That can be difficult in a small town where the only supermarket is supplied exclusively by a wholesaler who has a deal with Nestle. And ordering candy from Amazon will just mean you get melted and/or spoiled chocolate weeks after you order.

[-] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 months ago

It also means using Amazon which is not better than Nestle really

[-] donut4ever@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

Man, we need cut a lot of things in our lives to stop supporting these assholes. They're like cancer, they're everything. Some things I literally just had to give up completely

[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago
[-] nigh7y@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago
[-] Veltoss@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

"Eat the rich" by finding a candy sold by a different corporation? Focusing on stuff like this is such a pointless distraction from actual issues and solutions.

[-] vd1n@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

Chew em up n rat em out.

[-] gunslingerfry@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

When you're eating a candy and look at the wrapper and it says "Great chocolate flavor." You can't call it chocolate unless it meets certain quality criteria.

[-] DreadTowel@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

The issue is... I think it's gonna be hard to find a non-Nestle candy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 4 points 11 months ago

The more I read about corporations, the more of a reason I get to learn how to be fully self-reliant, save up for a farm in the middle of nowhere, and live alone growing my own crops until society hopefully collapses.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
1873 points (99.8% liked)

Memes

44043 readers
3324 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS