this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
61 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37634 readers
354 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Reading through the comments in this thread, I'd just like to mention how amusing it is to see so many people in the fediverse arguing in favor of walled gardens and vendor lock-in. Like, do you even know where you are?

[–] Reeek@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Owh dammit what now. I haven't read it yet but I'm already tired of it

[–] dope@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

So... here's a hot take I guess (disclaimer: i am an iphone user): People who are actively complaining about Apple having features that are unique to its platform don't know how products work. Apple created this technology and design themselves and other companies want to leech off the features. We should want competition like iMessage vs whatever Android uses. For anyone to basically say Google doesn't have the ability or resources to create an actual competitor is silly. They absolutely can make an alternative, but they choose not to. Google becomes complacent and progress slows or completely stops. I'd rather have a product that is FEATURE-FULL than feature-less. Additionally, this contact feature thing is neat, but I wouldn't call it a "game-changer" or revolutionary. It's similar to the super old ability that some cellular providers had/have where you could play a specific song instead of the calling tone.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. 😒

[–] Shortcake@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think from Google's perspective they don't want another chat app. They are fine if apple keeps iMessage. They want apple to use RCS standard as a fallback for iMessage when someone doesn't use an iPhone. The benefit being rich text messaging for all. It won't affect apple users except by making the experience better for everyone.

I personally use android and text my 8 friend who use android with RCS. There are some awesome things you can do with it, but for ease of talking with my co-workers and other family, I use bluebubbles to use iMessage on Android. The issue is that not everyone has a Mac to use this. Overall I think apple is going to apple.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bird@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Idk, I see this as a plus. It sucks when one android user in a group chat gimps file sharing for everyone.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] dave@lemmerz.org 3 points 1 year ago

Nobody except nerds like us care about RCS.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

The EU is already legislating to solve this. They are forcing open APIs on iMessage with the DMA.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›