this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
65 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

37939 readers
318 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The weekly post. As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @selfhst@fosstodon.org.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Anyone use authentik? Seems useful, most of my homelab services are unsecured ATM (just local only/vpn)

[–] Certainly_No_Brit@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I use authentik and I love how easy it is to create users, give them access to my services and even manage an LDAP outpost for the less-advanced services (Jellyfin, Calibre-Web). I heard that Keycloak is a better alternative to authentik, but I never used it, it looks very similar to it though.

[–] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Id like to centralize auth but I haven't dug into it yet. My concern is, can it be distributed? I have services spread across my homelab and multiple vpses. I don't want to lose auth if any of those is down.

It seems that Keycloak can sync multiple instances, but I don't know how good of an idea that is. I found something in it's documentation: https://www.keycloak.org/high-availability/introduction

[–] Sunny@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

Saw that ChrisLempa made a video about it recently, looks very interesting. Defo gonna give it a try some time soon 🌻

[–] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also, that CLI trick is crazy! Never knew that and I'm a fairly proficient shell user.

[–] mouse@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

It is very useful! It's also slightly customizable in that you can have it not save duplicate commands.

More information can be found on the Arch Wiki or the man page

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I’ve got something I’m hoping to see on here in a couple weeks.

I started work yesterday on a self hosted security camera system that uses v4l2 (so it works with webcams).

https://github.com/sciactive/soteria

Locally, I've got it loading the stream from the camera, encoding, and muxing, then pushing to a filesystem write stream, but I’ve discovered software based encoding in single threaded WASM is just too slow for what I’m trying to do. I’m going to rewrite it today to use FFMPEG externally for encoding.

It’s meant to be used with my WebDAV server

https://github.com/sciactive/nephele

which supports encryption and storage in a S3 compatible service. So you’ll get the benefits of a cloud security camera, but Google/Amazon/whatever won’t have access to your video.

[–] fangleone2526@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is really cool! Do you know of any existing tools doing similar stuff to this ?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There’s a few. You can search for “open source security camera” to find them.

The reason I’m building mine, instead of going with another solution is because I have a hard requirement that if all of my devices are offline, destroyed, or stolen, I want to still be able to see my videos (so cloud storage is required), and I want everything that goes into the cloud to be end to end encrypted.

That basically means everything necessary to view videos has to be stored in the cloud except the decryption password. So anything with a local database or unencrypted storage is out.

Some existing systems support some of those requirements, but afaik, there aren’t any that support all of the above (at least not easily). With Soteria and Nephele, if all of your cameras are offline and your WebDAV server is offline, you can just spin up a local WebDAV server with your S3 info, and you’ve got a working client to view all of your footage.

Having that can really help when something goes wrong. For example, I currently use Google Nest cams, and I was able to tell why my cameras went offline while I was away when the camera caught the transformer down the street blowing up right before the video cut out.

[–] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You should reach out to the authors! I have no clue how they create their "new" section

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I’m gonna wait until it’s ready to install. Right now it’s just in the early stages of development.

[–] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

The thought of colocating my homelab is intriguing... But also sounds like way too much effort and money

[–] ZebraGoose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Gonna try Janitorr!