this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
170 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43944 readers
518 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Fishroot@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

That book is so amazing. The film is good, but it really is a bastardization of the book, which is way more interesting in its characterizations of both "Rambo" (i forget his name in the book) and the Sheriff

[โ€“] Farman@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Taras bulba. the american version focuses way too much on the love story. The sets are awfull. Taras does not even get burned at the stake.

The russian verssion is better. But it still misses the point. It plays it straigth while the book is suposed to be satire. They kill his wife at the begining using it as a justification for the war, when she should die at the end as a consequence of taras being an ass.

The point of the book is to show that the myths of the russian frontiersman are bullshit, because if they really acted like taras does they would all get whiped out.

Gogol is still an arch reactionary and you can tell he geuinley beleves some of the things he is moking. So its suposed to have a silly ironic self mocking sligthly nhilist tone. Remininicent of a lot of stuff in the internet. But both adaptations play it straigth and pay too much atention to the polish girl.

[โ€“] barrbaric@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Foundation TV series. No, it's not a movie, but it's so bad I feel it should count anyway.

[โ€“] tehciolo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

It's not all bad! The Cleon part is pretty cool. You know... the part that is not in the books at all.

[โ€“] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Vampire$ -> John Carpenter's Vampires

I hate to admit it but it's actually worse an adaptation than the Starship Troopers "adaptation." Although admittedly I do like the JCV movie. I used to like Starship Troopers until I found out the director made a mockery of Heinlein on purpose because Verhooven is a jackass. Did you even read the book?

Anyway.

As I understand it there actually is a reason for this. Basically, a studio ends up with the rights to an IP, and they sit on it because they suck at the one thing they're supposed to be good at. Then along comes somebody with a project idea, and the studio goes, oh that's similar to something we already have in the pipe. Then they steal that idea, tweak the script to include at least one or two elements from the IP, claimants an original work and they don't have to pay the original screenwriter, and churn out something that may or may not be any good, but is nothing like the IP, thus potentially making significant profits for the executives at the meager cost of pissing off the original IPs core fan base.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ