None of those are pro iran.
A reminder that we dont know if this is true or not. And if its true what really happened. Most western news on iran are like those on north korea greatly exagerated or completly made up.
So you are unwigling to learn or just have problems reading?
We still have our big wet boy for that.
Just search opium in russia or opium in iran. You will see that its a huge problem there. You will also see both countries complaining to the us that they are maliciously increasing opium production.
The us was using opium as a weapon of war against russia and iran. Its well known and the public health concequences in both those countries were horrific
But since mexico has orders of mag itude more state capacity than the taliban their failure to solve opium problem makes one almost certain the us goverment is also behind that.
I have "any". So do i have the most pronouns or the least?
The 4chaner pretending their meme magic was invoking ancient gods seem like they have a closer conrction to reality than whoever wrote that. Unless im an idiot and its satire in wich case great bit.
Because we cant tell if your post is satire or not and it confuses us.
I was skeptical until tesla became a thing. In 2010 a friend wanted me to buy and i refused because it was so oviously a scam. Despite huge subsidies it has made a majority of its profits from bitcoin, wich is also a scam. Yet its worth a lot of money. The only way to explain it is that the rate of profit is low enough that most proffit is coming from risk rather than from the actual natural rate of profitthe us already deep into the canobalistic phase all societies end in.
So esentially we are living in the industrial equivalent of an agrarian crisis. unless something fundamental changes in our understanding of phisics the empire may colapse under a significant enough stocastic shock. And that treshold is only going to get smaller. In this analogy covid was the equivalent of the 1315 famine. Wich didnt cause a collapse but made it clear the collapse was imminent.
Honestly this all sounds like arbitrary shit someone made up without proper justification or consideration.
All forms of goverment have checks and balances. How is this special?
All forms of goverment are a way to achive consensus amongst the rulling class. How is this different?
Why is this separation of powers the ideal one?
Why separate the legislative and the judiciary when there is a rich tradition of common law?
Why cant the executive act by commitie or in a decentralized way?
Are these "powers" actually autonomus or arbitrary constructions dependent on other institutions to act?
Why are these considered the central responsabilities of the state? Why cant the legislature and the judiciary be separate from the state like in the abassid era?
Why cant a workers party be a branch?