this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
335 points (96.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29819 readers
710 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There was a time it would’ve fit on a floppy

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is really nonsensical. It could fit on a piece of paper in font size 8 if you go back far enough and "stretch" the definition of Internet.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Not true. The first document on the internet was, in fact, 7 pages in 8pt font.

It was the New Purchase brochure from a Packard Bell 286 4MHz from Circuit City transcribed into .doc format.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Yeah, but if you wrote really small on a note card you could have used the entire internet on a test!

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And were all 7 of those pages uploaded at the same time? Ha, gotchu now! (But for real, is .doc that old?)

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

According to wikipedia, "Microsoft has used the extension since 1983."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Lol, no idea

[–] kambusha@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

“Congratulations on buying a Packard Bell computer. Would you like to register me?”

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Welcome to Packard Bell Navigator!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Anyone remember that offline Wikipedia reader that had the whole text of English wiki on it? I always thought it was neat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiReader

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You can still download an archive of Wikipedia today, and it's smaller than you'd expect

[–] essell@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How big do I expect it to be?

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bigger than it actually is

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

At least twelve megabytes. Probably even more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_grass_trainer@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Microsoft Encarta 98

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 8 months ago

Nowadays there's Kiwix

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] freebread@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The power of the sun in the palm of my hand.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The power of Sun Microsystems in the palm of my hand

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

The unmatched power of the sun, even?

[–] TheLugal@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

There also was a time when the entirety of the human language would fit in this thread.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] dumbass@lemy.lol 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

grunts don't make me turn this mammoth around

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

Back in like 2005 or 2006, I remember posting an article to Fark about a company that wanted to make a laptop that had the entire internet cached on it so you could browse the web offline. That was almost 20 years ago and I remember saying "they have seriously underestimated the amount of porn on the internet."

[–] catharso@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 8 months ago

The entirety of the internet on my toilet.

[–] yiliu@informis.land 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I remember, towards the end of the last millennium, marveling with some friends about an article estimating the current size of all the data on the internet. IIRC, it was in the neighborhood of a couple hundred terabytes. Wouldn't fit on your phone, but there's plenty of data hoarder types who have that kinda storage on the server in their spare room.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 months ago

There is a time where the entire universe could of fit in the volume of your phone.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

One single html page? I guess, yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I wonder when smartphones with a capacity of 40 zettabytes will officially come out. Then we can post this all over again.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The internet or the world wide web?

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Well both technically, but at different times

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›