this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
151 points (99.3% liked)

Cybersecurity

5639 readers
139 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like a concerted effort by a reasonably competent state actor. The +0800 timezone offset implies parts of Asia and is a small but crucial detail, esp given the commit times. In other words, China, Malaysia, Korea, etc. -- somewhere in Asia.

OTOH the author even concedes identity theft or smart attempts to discredit and point at Asia. Still, is on par for Chinese and NK actors.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It could also be the opposite, someone trying to act like one of the Asian countries. The article lists the UTC times for the commits at 12-17, which would correspond to 8AM-1PM EST or 5-10AM PDT. That also could be fudged, or it could be a relatively new US spook working primarily in the mornings. Or if it's someone in Asia, that's 8PM-1AM, which is the perfect time for an evening hacker.

It's really not clear who's behind it.

I'm guessing an independent hacker in Asia because a state actor would probably just exploit existing bugs instead of adding new ones, and they certainly wouldn't do something as obvious as "safe_fprintf -> fprintf." I'm guessing this is all one individual trying to create business for themselves.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 2 points 7 months ago

In other words, China, Malaysia, Korea, etc. – somewhere in Asia.

The Shadow Broker's leaks showed that state actors had whole tool suites to ensure that the product appeared like it was coming from a different location. Given that those tools have been leaked since 2016 and the concept is even older; relying on metadata like timezones, character set, etc... to make determinations about location is unreliable at best.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What a wild read. Definitely smells like nation state actor.

[–] Ashtefere@aussie.zone 4 points 7 months ago

Timeframes of commits line up with afternoon/evening in Moscow.

[–] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

I'm not really convinced. I haven't seen anything outside the capabilities of a talented individual, and such an exploit would be worth a lot of money, so the motivation is there.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's so disgusting to think that Jigar Kumar guy pressuring the original maintainer was Jia himself just manipulating his way into a maintainer role.

I hate people sometimes.

[–] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago

It may not have a been a single person in the first place. “Jia” may have just been a front for multiple people or a team of people working together to facilitate the whole situation.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

this is insane that it lasted as long as it was before found. I'm glad that was quickly resolved before it hit stable.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And there's the Open Collective Foundation closing (not Open Source Collective or Open Collective Inc), which means a bunch of projects need to deal with a bunch of paperwork.

I wish FOSS had a better community backing so a larger group of trusted devs could handle maintenance on multiple projects. Basically, any "production" Linux distribution would only ship software with stable maintenance. I'd join such a group, but as always, funding is an issue.