this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
422 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

48002 readers
1312 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 75 points 7 months ago

wanst that the whole damn (stated) point of making it proprietary?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 70 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I can recommend a minty flavored alternative if you're sick of it.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Green Ubuntu is Best Ubuntu

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Btw I have no idea why they want to mix Mint with Cinnamon, must taste ugly.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Literally what I'm chewing right now. Its pretty okay.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I should do a "sorting DEs by their taste" meme

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, once you crunch down the edges its pretty good. Make sure to use optical rather than solid state tho.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I prefer some POP in my ubuntu, but green is flavorful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

A fresh breath of minty cinnamon, mate?

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I recommend Debian. Why go downstream when you can go upstream?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 59 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 38 points 7 months ago (72 children)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I use Ubuntu.

Downvotes to the right mocking laughs to my face.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (71 replies)
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 59 points 7 months ago

It always takes a disaster before corporations act.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 57 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why just now? Meanwhile, all Debian packages on their apt repos are reviewed and maintained by Debian.

[–] AChiTenshi@sh.itjust.works 29 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I would imagine the recent xz backdoor discovery spooked them a bit. So now they are going to check things.

We shall see if it continues or not.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 33 points 7 months ago

It was probably the wave of phishing apps that scared them tbh

[–] lengau@midwest.social 9 points 7 months ago

This predates that discovery.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 8 points 7 months ago (13 children)

No. They will likely still use release tarballs

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ArtVandalist@lemmus.org 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Which means at all previous times, for 20 years, noone did check fck sht.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

I've heard all the arguments about how these new packaging formats are supposed to make things easy for developers and for users with different use cases than my own (apparently), but I will continue to avoid them until they have further matured. I'm relieved that this is still possible.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The idea is good I think but the implementation has only ever caused me problems and seems to have a bunch of frustrating edge cases.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I've been using snaps for a few years now and while they still could use some improvements, the snaps I'm currently using seem to be fairly indistinguishable from deb-based packaging thanks to bug fixes they have done over the years. I think the idea of containerized applications is a good one, I think it actually can be safer. Performance is also fine for me with snap applications even like Firefox snap startup speed, although I'm using an R9 5900x and Gen 4 M2 NVMe SSD so maybe that's why, or maybe they really have improved the snap software and it is just as fast now for the most part.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How is that not a security theater? , you just need to :

  • publish a good snap
  • change it to malware after it is approved
  • profit

The extra cost added to override this is fairly small, i don't think it will help.

[–] progandy@feddit.de 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

At least this prevents impersonation of well-known publishers or their software. Maybe all changes to metadata like the description should require a manual review even for established packages.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Maybe adding a proprietary *layer to an open-source OS was a bad idea (for end users)?

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 20 points 7 months ago

Only took them 6 years of malware

[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I have this unpopular thought: If I had to choose between Canonical's Snap Store and Apple App Store...

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


After repeatedly suffering issues with scam apps making it onto the Snap Store, Canonical maker of Ubuntu Linux have now decided to manually look over submissions.

I've covered the issues with the Snap Store a few times now like on March 19th when ten scam crypto apps appeared, got taken down and then reappeared under a different publisher.

Also earlier back in February there was an issue where a user actually lost their wallet as a result of a fake app.

Multiple fake apps were also put up back in October last year as well, so it was a repeating issue that really needed dealing with properly.

So to try and do something about it, Canonical's Holly Hall has posted on their Discourse forum about how "The Store team and other engineering teams within Canonical have been continuously monitoring new snaps that are being registered, to detect potentially malicious actors" and that they will now do manual reviews whenever people try to register "a new snap name".

Hopefully this will begin to put an end to scam apps making it into the Snap Store and onto machines running Ubuntu and any other Linux distribution that enables Snap packages.


The original article contains 238 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 18%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›