What's the catch? Google doesn't do anything that doesn't fuck users and give themselves advantages, so there's gotta be a hidden catch to this
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
16 points (90.0% liked)
Linux and Tech News
950 readers
20 users here now
This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:
You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:
Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I hate Google as much as the next fedizen but I think this one might just not have a catch. It's nothing crazy, just that if you're sending more than 5000 bulk emails/day to gmail users, you have to set up proper DNS records, which if you're managing a private email server you should probably have done anyways.
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are standards that improve email sender authenticity and should be enforced by every email provider. This is a great next step that basically enforces that the source of the message is pre approved by the domain's owner. There's no downside and any company seriously impacted isn't using bare minimum email sending settings.
You still have to be cautious for lookalike domains, but this should help block lazy spoofing attempts.
The catch is if you wanna spam Gmail accounts you'll need to register with Google and most likely pay a fee to bypass the filter.
Google have to pay for the storage of that spam emails in Gmail users inboxes, not paying for that storage is the catch.
Yahoo did it too and might have actually been competition to gmail.
Just stick phishme.com or knowb4 in your header and bypass the filtering
/S