301
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Lemme guess, Republicans oppose it. They want this shit in our drinking water because it’s tradition and it’ll save some billionaire some money.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The tories in London opposed regulation around dumping in public waterways and now the Thames is literally full of shit

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yay! I'm a big advocate of 'point of use filtration', for drinking water, shower/bath water, and don't forget for your garden/ landscaping, too.

Here's some more linx if you're interested:

The Omnipresence of PFAS—and What We Can Do About Them https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/what-to-know-about-pfas

Population-Wide Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Drinking Water in the United States https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00713

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in United States tapwater: Comparison of underserved private-well and public-supply exposures and associated health implications https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412023003069?via%3Dihub

FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Takes Critical Action to Protect Communities from PFAS Pollution in Drinking Water https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/04/10/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-takes-critical-action-to-protect-communities-from-pfas-pollution-in-drinking-water/

PFAS Explained https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained

[-] tjhart85@kbin.social 14 points 2 months ago

SCOTUS declaring this illegal in 3...2...1!

/S (I hope)

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

The bar is so goddamn low

[-] Waterdoc@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

Some facts I posted in another thread about this topic;

Background info.

  • PFAS is a class of chemical substances with varying properties, but in general act as surfactants.

  • PFAS are considered carcinogenic and impact birth weight.

  • PFAS contain a carbon-fluorine bond, which is a very strong bond that does not naturally degrade.

  • Some PFAS will naturally decrease concentration over time, but only to be transformed into other compounds that will not (often PFOS).

Regulation.

  • The US EPA has taken the approach of regulating a select few PFAS, generally based on their known toxicity. PFOA and PFOS will essentially be limited to a concentration of zero.

  • The US EPA has been working on this for years. Mr. Biden did not snap his fingers and make a regulation. These things move much slower than that, and the industry generally feels that this process moved too quickly because there is limited understanding of how much PFAS exists in drinking water.

  • Health Canada has proposed a guideline which limits PFAS to 30 ng/L (ppt) as a total sum of all compounds that can be accurately measured. Currently their guidelines limit PFOA to 200 ng/L and PFOS to 600 ng/L. Health Canada does not regulate your water provider through, that is up to your provincial/territorial government, which may have different guidelines than this.

PFAS in the environment.

  • PFAS is ubiquitous in the environment due to its travel through the water cycle. It exists in Antarctic ice and on top of Mount Everest.

  • Usually the largest sources of PFAS in drinking water are firefighting training areas that used PFAS containing foams (airports and military bases), landfills, certain manufacturers (metal plating, paper, semiconductors), and municipal wastewater. There are many more sources than this though.

  • Landfills and municipal wastewater tend to be the highest mass loading of PFAS because of the ubiquity of PFAS in consumer products.

Treatment.

  • PFAS can be destroyed using electrochemical and thermal methods, but these are not feasible for drinking water treatment.

  • The current approach for drinking water treatment is adsorption to either granular activated carbon (GAC) or ion exchange resin.

  • Treating PFAS at the source is always the goal instead of treating it at a water treatment plant.

Feel free to ask questions, I will do my best to answer them!

[-] WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

SCOTUS will strike this down sadly. The billionaire foundations have destroyed this country’s (and much of the world’s) ability to make changes at a pivotal time for our species and the planet. All because a few hundred ultra wealthy people with group think decided their score card levels of wealth were more important than anything else. The ultra rich are a disease.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Can this apply to sparkling water manufacturers?

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
301 points (98.7% liked)

News

21671 readers
4404 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS