this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
83 points (94.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
5139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

The “small government” groups have a large overlap with the small gene pool groups.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So one argument proffered is actually almost progressive. The argument is that a gay couple won't have any risks associated with having biological children. I mean it's almost wholesome.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think it's actually hypocritical to not allow an incestuous marriage. Plaintiffs in Obergefell v. Hodges based most of their arguments on the idea that marriage is about love, not children. The argument against siblings or first cousins marrying is really because it's a taboo. Yes, a straight couple could have a child with serious defects but lots of other, unrelated people, also have genes that would create a child with serious defects.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

The one-off cousin baby has relatively low chances of genetic problems, it's near the background rate. It's only when you have multiple generations of in-breeding that you start to get problems. But, it's pretty tough to draw the line at "don't marry your cousin too often."

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

Pro Life Republicans were more upset about this bill then about Kids being MURDERED in school!

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Quick question...

Fucking why?!

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Honestly, it's super weird to marry a cousin, but I think that any consenting adults should be able to marry each other.

[–] badbrainstorm -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Must have more babies for capital greed.

Also, must end Medicaid. There will be no financial help for all the handicapped inbred kids

Edit: /s 🙄

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Marriage status and having kids are different things.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Dammit! What the hell is going on in Tennessee! First they make chem trails illegal now you can't marry family!

Won't somebody think of the children!

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Shelbyville Manhattan is spinning in his grave in between his 2 attractive cousins’ graves. https://youtu.be/ULPwkpCy_-8