this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
170 points (97.8% liked)

News

22956 readers
3658 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made it easier for workers who are transferred from one job to another against their will to pursue job discrimination claims under federal civil rights law, even when they are not demoted or docked pay.

Workers only have to show that the transfer resulted in some, but not necessarily significant, harm to prove their claims, Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court.

The justices unanimously revived a sex discrimination lawsuit filed by a St. Louis police sergeant after she was forcibly transferred, but retained her rank and pay.

Sgt. Jaytonya Muldrow had worked for nine years in a plainclothes position in the department’s intelligence division before a new commander reassigned her to a uniformed position in which she supervised patrol officers. The new commander wanted a male officer in the intelligence job and sometimes called Muldrow “Mrs.” instead of “sergeant,” Kagan wrote.

Muldrow sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion and national origin. Lower courts had dismissed Muldrow’s claim, concluding that she had not suffered a significant job disadvantage.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 5 months ago (5 children)

IANAL, could this potentially be used for forced relocations caused by return to office mandates for previously fully remote jobs?

[–] iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is a discrimination case, which currently only applies to protected classes, such as race, religion, age, etc. But age discrimination can begin at 40 years old, so it's a class that everyone eventually gets to be a part of...if they are lucky enough to live that long.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago

It's also a clear discrimination case, in that the commander made it pretty clear that she was being moved because of her sex. Mandating that all employees return to the office, regardless of protected class, probably wouldn't pass the sniff test.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Only if A) the job was remote when accepted (meaning you weren't in the office before COVID), and B) you have some disability preventing you from getting to or working in an office.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago

I think that would still help a surprising number of people

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It certainly doesn't hurt, but she won based on it being an illegal form of discrimination causing some form of harm, a non-discriminatory policy might be viewed differently.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it does unnecessarily impact specific subsets of people (people who are unable to drive due to disabilities, people that can't relocate to certain areas due to severe allergies, medical conditions that have very limited specialists available to treat, etc)

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

ADA covers a bit of that already, and can already be effectively welded against return to office policies, but they are individual specific exceptions to a global policy. This was targeted illegal discrimination.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

*"No, not like that!" *

[–] breetai@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Only if that job was remote because of the disability.

Otherwise, no.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Extremely rare supreme court w

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh Tesla is so fucked and I couldn't be happier.

Workers also describe the Fremont factory as being racially segregated. Tesla has erected a tent behind the factory building in which additional production happens; it offers little protection from the cold at night, portable toilets instead of proper bathrooms, and no indoor places to eat. Black workers say that they are more likely than others to be forced to work in the tent. They are also disproportionately assigned the most physically demanding tasks on the factory floor, such as lifting heavy panes of glass and installing bulky car seats. Non-Black workers are more likely to work in electronics, quality assurance, and the office—jobs that can be done while sitting.

...

Moses Sullivan hoped his experience in accounting and his bachelor’s degree would help him get a job in Tesla’s accounting department. He started working on the factory floor in January 2020 to “get my foot in the door,” he said. Then he was assigned to a tent behind the building. “It was a Jim Crow situation,” Sullivan said. “The Black people, honestly, were in a position to do the grunt work.” He applied for a job related to accounting and was rebuffed. “You want to contribute or be in a position where you can bring your skills in, your knowledge, degrees, your expertise,” he said. Yet no matter how many openings he saw for jobs he was qualified to do, he never moved up.

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/tesla-racism-sexual-harassment/

(Everything in this long article is horrific, just a warning.)

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

At SpaceX it was a commonly known risk to be let go for "performance reasons" when women employees got pregnant or even when it was found out that men employees' wives got pregnant, since they wouldn't be able to work 80 hours a week. An old coworker of mine worked there and said he never told anyone at the company when his wife got pregnant. The company was sued multiple times for sex discrimination from what I heard. A current coworker used to work at SpaceX when they shared offices with Tesla. She said she never felt safe there because the culture was so sexist and creepy.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

They don't say much about SpaceX in the article, but the sexual harassment tolerated at Tesla is just jaw-dropping. Things like overtly asking for a handjob or even sticking their leg between a woman's legs.