this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
76 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

39376 readers
361 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crispyflagstones@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Somebody's gonna make a federated TikTok, aren't they? We're gonna have TikTokers flooding the Fediverse. We're so fucked.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't actually have any qualms with that. Power to the people!

In reality though there a planned executive order to forcing Know Your Customer rules on all US web hosts and Internet architecture, so if you're planning on hosting a fediverse server in the US, the US government will need to know your identity.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/01/29/2024-01580/taking-additional-steps-to-address-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-significant-malicious

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

land of the free btw

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

That should happen regardless. The main issue with tiktok is not the concept, it's the recommendation algorithm and the agenda behind it.

[–] ajsadauskas@aus.social 11 points 1 year ago

@crispyflagstones @yogthos Someone is named @dansup who also created @pixelfed, the app is called Loops, you can follow his progress here: @loops

[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 6 points 1 year ago

Video support could be a "killer app" on threads to embrace and extinguish the fediverse.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

If that becomes the case and you don't want to see it, block it. Easy enough.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well there’s PeerTube and PixelFed. Perhaps a few will try it, but mostly I think they”ll go to other corporate American platforms like Instagram.

[–] Pattyice@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I figured most would just go to YouTube shorts

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m still confused on how they enforce this

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

They have the app stores ban it from being downloaded if you are in the USA. This is already done, and app stores aren't affected by on device VPNs, so it wouldn't be that easy to get around.

For example, you can't download this app since (I'm guessing) you live in the USA, similar enough. It's geolocked. Same will happen with Tiktok.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please, PLEASE, let this be the case.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think there's a zero chance China would allow the sale. Imagine the precedent giving into such mob tactics would set. US could just go after any successful Chinese company doing business in US and demand that it's sold off to American oligarchs.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Exactly, this asset is worth nothing to the CPP if sold.

If it was a fully private company which is supposed to make money, they would sell it and move on to invest their money somewhere else.

Regulating the market is important and is not done enough in the US, last time was decades ago with AT&T and Standard Oil. Today they should have broken up Apple, Google, Amazon, etc. To prevent monopolies but they don't.

But yeah, politically it's much easier to go after a Chinese company.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (35 children)

Exactly, this asset is worth nothing to the CPP if sold.

TikTok is worth approximately nothing to the CPC either way. It’s not like the Chinese state is hurting for money. They have a surplus of US dollars that they’re busy unloading, and they have fiat monetary sovereignty of their own currency. The app is banned in China, so nobody there is going to miss it. Who is invested in ByteDance that might care? American private equity: ByteDance’s US investors weigh options as bill to ban TikTok advances

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

fiat monetary sovereignty of their own currency

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ecksell@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

They are not giving up the algorithm, simple as that.

load more comments
view more: next ›