Affidavit

joined 1 year ago
[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I guess pretty much everywhere is authoritarian because they disagree with your definition of 'work'. This person was refused entry by Canada for the same reason. They would have had their visa cancelled in my country and likely dozens of other countries too.

Many countries specifically have a visa for people who will be working to support themselves (often titled 'working holiday').

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

She was refused entry to Canada.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

B-but my hands! They're so BIG!

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I don't mind this. I also don't mind watching a movie in a non-English language so long as there are subtitles (Pan's Labyrinth was awesome).

What I dislike are movies/series that decide to include a conversation in a different language without providing subtitles.

I hate this. Spending the next 5-10 minutes searching the internet to find a complete script of a show just so I have a complete understanding of what's going on is annoying, not fun.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 49 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, this is going to bug me for the rest of my life.

Thanks.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Okay, so listen to this, everybody. The Stardew Valley NPCs are getting all upset with me for digging in their trash, like, seriously? What’s the problem? I’m a genius, folks, very successful, and I carry this town all the time! They’re all like “Ew! That’s awful!” But you know what’s not awful? The fact that people showed up in droves at my last rally - a gigantic crowd! They love me, they really do! Without me here, Pelican Town would be in shambles, believe me! So let’s not kid ourselves, don’t test me, or I’ll show them what a mess looks like!

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I had to read this 3 times to make sense of it... Look, I know full stops are overrated, but commas are important! And they're easy too, just place one in the exact same place you would if you paused while speaking.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

This is ingeniously spiteful and I love it.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

This is a good explanation. I can see how a multi-tiered approach like this makes sense, particularly for those most public-facing. Thanks.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's a good point; my company actually does implement something like this, though it invites intervention from the recipient for confirmation. I have previously received e-mail notifications stating that an e-mail has been 'held' as being suspicious and provided me an option to 'release' the e-mail (in these cases the e-mails were genuine and known in advance to me).

Of course, I have no simple way to determine if there is also an additional hard filter that blocks out obvious phishing with no notification to the end user.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Jesus Christ can you at least be accurate?

Speaking of accuracy, your comment seems to identify the wrong issue. Navigating the install menus in a non-Arch linux distro is pretty much analogous to Windows. The biggest difference is that Linux distros don't have 3-4 pages where they sneakily try to include privacy-breaching clauses during the installation.

The real issue is starting the installation in the first place. Windows is easy, because hardware manufacturer's have en masse bent over to willingly present themselves to Microsoft, Linux doesn't have this advantage and users must figure out how to get around the 7,000 different Secure Boot UEFI configurations before they can even start the installation process.

view more: ‹ prev next ›