AntiOutsideAktion

You're wrong and your argument was so stupid that there's no defending it. That's why you're play acting a fool and avoiding the criticism of it.

If it's not homophobic to attack a politician being insufficiently bloodthirsty towards another country, why do you never see this attack deployed against women in the same way?

Answer or don't. But please fuck off if you don't.

You're too easily impressed with the most superficial bullshit possible. The difference you highlighted is purely symbolic on both sides. As if cops are restrained by the law in the first place. Both parties have the exact same policy on policing and your 'good guys' are almost exclusively the ones in charge of the cities that actually run those police departments. All they do is give them more funding. And to confound people like you they engage in 'liberal box checking' where they 'do something' that changes absolutely nothing structurally. And then you turn around and defend these murderers like they're the good guys. You're a boob.

I honestly can't tell if you're just too prideful to admit you're wrong. I don't believe any present minded, awake person could be naive to the concept of a discovery algorithm. So you setting the bar at 'you can literally find it if you know what you're looking for and try' for government control of thought and discourse seems genuinely in bad faith.

This clarification feels tedious but apparently necessary: a political attack made in public.

I wonder if you'd defend the f-slur as not being homophobic because some gay friends of mine might use it subversively. That is not in the context you were asked for an example.

No, you're a pointless individual because you literally have no point in this argument. I asked you for what your point was and you've done nothing but evade and insult. You're a vapid fucking idiot. See? I can actually stake a position.

If it's not homophobic because women can also suck dick, provide a single example of this attack being deployed on a woman.

There is substantially less control of media and internet in the west as compared to china.

"it doesn't count as being controlled by the government because the guy who owns the government controls it directly"

There is no argument that you can make that isn't stupid because you are wrong.

word mean bad and bad thing get bad word

all bad words correct

only idiot not understand that

Thank you for explaining to everyone that propaganda and censorship are related but not identical terms. I'm sure the time spent reading it was just as valuable as the time spent writing it. And now it's gone.

And while your point is kind of dumb in that it assumes every society is exactly the same and that differences in how they spend money is explainable by scale of the economy, it's extra dumb because by that mechanism you're conceding the main point of contention that the west controls the thought and discourse in its empire more than China does.

are you being deliberately stupid as a joke right now?

It’s probably more important if Putin the actual person is actually Asian or not

wrong

for the reasons already mentioned but not addressed

my eyes blurred with boredom while you were spending half your reply on framing

can you just do me a favor and edit that down and reply again with it? thanks