Architeuthis

joined 2 years ago
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 11 points 6 months ago

Base open source model just means some company commanding a great deal of capital and compute made the weights public to fuck with LLMaaS providers it can't directly compete with yet, it's not some guy in a garage training and RLFH them for months on end just to hand the result over to you to fine tune for writing caiaphas cain fanfiction.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's some wildly disingenuous goal post moving when describing what was meant to be The Future of Finance™ at the time.

Like saying yeh, AGI was a pipedream and there's no disruption of technical professions to be seen anywhere, but you can't deny LLMs made it way easier for bad actors to actively fuck with elections, and the people posting autogenerated youtube slop 5.000 times a day sure did make some legitimate ad money.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 10 points 6 months ago

Oh no, the premise of money and capitalism, my only weakness.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

So many low-hanging fruits. Unbelievable fruits. You wouldn’t believe how low they’re hanging.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 11 points 6 months ago

Zero interest rate period, when the taps of investor money were wide open and spraying at full volume because literally any investment promising some sort of return was a better proposition than having your assets slowly diminished by e.g. inflation in the usually safe investment vehicles.

Or something to that effect, I am not an economist.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I can never tell, is there an actual 'experiment' taking place with an LLM-backend agent actually trying stuff on a working vm or are they just prompting a chatbot to write a variation of a story (or ten, or a million) about what it might have done given these problem parameters?

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, you could have answered by naming one fabled new ability LLM's suddenly 'gained' instead of being a smarmy tadpole, but you didn't.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 21 points 7 months ago (6 children)

What new AI abilities, LLMs aren't pokemon.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Slate Scott just wrote about a billion words of extra rigorous prompt-anthropomorphizing fanfiction on the subject of the paper, he called the article When Claude Fights Back.

Can't help but wonder if he's just a critihype enabling useful idiot who refuses to know better or if he's being purposefully dishonest to proselytize people into his brand of AI doomerism and EA, or if the difference is meaningful.

edit: The claude syllogistic scratchpad also makes an appearance, it's that thing where we pretend that they have a module that gives you access to the LLM's inner monologue complete with privacy settings, instead of just recording the result of someone prompting a variation of "So what were you thinking when you wrote so and so, remember no one can read what you reply here". Que a bunch of people in the comments moving straight into wondering if Claude has qualia.

view more: ‹ prev next ›