BlueMonday1984

joined 1 year ago
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We're seeing it in action right now, tonight in this very thread:

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago

I'd bet good money they vibe-coded the whole thing. Its AI, the whole point is to enable laziness, grifts and laziness in grifts.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Here's the link, so you can read Stack's teardown without giving orange site traffic:

https://ewanmorrison.substack.com/p/the-tranhumanist-cult-test

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Stumbled across some AI criti-hype in the wild on BlueSky:

The piece itself is a textbook case of AI anthropomorphisation, presenting it as learning to hide its "deceptions" when its actually learning to avoid tokens that paint it as deceptive.

On an unrelated note, I also found someone openly calling gen-AI a tool of fascism in the replies - another sign of AI's impending death as a concept (a sign I've touched on before without realising), if you want my take:

AI bros are exceedingly lazy fucks by nature, so this kind of shit should be pretty rare. Combined with their near-complete lack of taste, and the risk that such an attempt succeeds drops pretty low.

(Sidenote: Didn't know about Samizdat until now, thanks for the new rabbit hole to go down)

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Is there already a nice term for “this was published before the slop flood gates opened”? There should be.

"Pre-slopnami" works well enough, I feel.

EDIT: On an unrelated note, I suspect hand-writing your original manuscript (or using a typewriter) will also help increase the value, simply through strongly suggesting ChatGPT was not involved with making it.

I tagged it NSFW because the previous thread was tagged NSFW.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump administration’s blockchain plan for USAID is a real head-scratcher

Taking a shot in the dark here and saying they're implementing blockchain to enable corruption and fraud.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago

Ultra-rare footage of orange site having a good take for once:

Top-notch sneer from lobsters' top comment, as well (as of this writing):

You want my opinion, I expect AntiRez' pleas to fall on deaf ears. The AI funders are only getting funded due to LLM hype - when that dies, investors' reason to throw money at them dies as well.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't mean to link something else, I just mangled my description. Thanks for catching it.

 

I stopped writing seriously about “AI” a few months ago because I felt that it was more important to promote the critical voices of those doing substantive research in the field.

But also because anybody who hadn’t become a sceptic about LLMs and diffusion models by the end of 2023 was just flat out wilfully ignoring the facts.

The public has for a while now switched to using “AI” as a negative – using the term “artificial” much as you do with “artificial flavouring” or “that smile’s artificial”.

But it seems that the sentiment might be shifting, even among those predisposed to believe in “AI”, at least in part.

Between this, and the rise of "AI-free" as a marketing strategy, the bursting of the AI bubble seems quite close.

Another solid piece from Bjarnason.

view more: ‹ prev next ›