Bogasse

joined 2 years ago
[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

C'est une mise en abîme de sarcasme ?

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Linux, Microsoft & iOS engineers have a flat tire.

  • The Apple engineer : "let's replace this tire ASAP"
  • The Linux engineer : "we need to understand what caused the issue first, or it might happen again"
  • The Microsoft engineer : "shouldn't we just go back in the car and see if the issue solves itself?"
[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

To be fair (French here), we love to make fun of your elections but ours in not much better.

We elect our president in two rounds and only keep the two best candidates for the second round. So if every candidates has around 10% of votes, two rather niche candidates could get to second round. To avoid this, it means that candidates that have compatible-ish ideas should team up on compromises but apparently that's not a competitive strategy (compromises make you look weak maybe ? 🤷)

So yeah, we can also have weird results. But at least we have a large panel of ideas that gets represented-ish (our society gets more and more polarized too, and this is frightening).

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The posts you reply to have been deleted, but I'm assuming it's talking about "taking responsibilities about the people's vote" based on this single quote...

From a foreigner perspective it's hard to imagine how a federal election is perceived for Americans, because your country is so big with so many states that have completely different mindset and economics.

In Europe we have a shared parliament that works on making compromises on some topics, but I guess a global referendum would be a huge mess too.

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago

It's stressful enough from the outside 😰

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Actually this sounds fun, I know how I'll waste some time this weekend :D

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We actually it seems quite fair-ish 🤷

AI has the potential to be a truly revolutionary development, one that could drive advancement for centuries. But it must be done correctly. These companies stand to make billions of dollars in revenue, and yet they violated our privacy and are training their tools using our data without our permission. Recent history shows we must act now if we’re to avoid an even worse version of surveillance capitalism.

Also from 2023 : https://proton.me/blog/ai-gdpr

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It would be fair if ChatGPT or any american service received the same treatment, but the only article I found from 2023 seems quite neutral :/

https://proton.me/blog/privacy-and-chatgpt

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, Astral as an history of managing to build tools that are actually very very clearly more usable than the pile of poop that Python ecosystem is 😅

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've seen much pointless dumb shit these last days, but this one still manages to shine.

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think this rate limiting mechanism is mostly a niceness rule : you should try to not put too much pressure on any website and obey the rules defined in its robots.txt.

So I guess this idea is not bad as it would mostly penalize bad players.

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Je parle de son comportement, pas de ses fonctions reproductrices (mais oui l'image est peut être pas très appropriée).

view more: ‹ prev next ›