CeeBee_Eh

joined 2 months ago
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Doubled down?

Yes, doubled down. After being called out Linus made two separate long posts about why he wasn't wrong.

They also formed a volunteer team of "beta tester" viewers who see each video pre-release

So using free labour instead of just doing their jobs? If they can't "catch any mistakes internally", then they're just bad at their jobs (which they are).

I think they handled it well.

Yes, the PR team they used gave them a good corporate playbook to work with.

"Slowed the upload cadence" is just another way to say "wait for this to blow over".

I used to watch LTT, mostly because it was interesting from the "let's see what those guys have to say". I had zero interest in their technical expertise because, well, they don't really have any. They've always been clowns, but after their storage server video and their Linux "challenge" I lost all respect for any talent or knowledge they claimed to have. After the Billet Labs incident I lost any shred of respect I had for them.

They are clowns.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

If you put a gazillion monkeys on a typewriter they can write Shakespeare.

This is a mathematical curiosity borne out of pure randomness. An LLM trained on a dataset to generate similar content is quite the opposite of randomness.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Get a load of this maroon, they think LLMs are actually sapient!

I guess reading comprehension is as bad here as it's ever been on the internet.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I’m pretty sure LLMs have exactly reproduced copyrighted passages.

If I asked you to recite a popular poem, nursery rhyme, a song, or book passage there's a good chance you could. Everyone can recite things word for word.

It's the same with LLM's, if they're asked to generate, for example, an article written by the New York Post about a specific topic they really did write about, then it's similar to asking someone to recite a poem or song.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Like fuck it is. An LLM "learns" by memorization and by breaking down training data into their component tokens, then calculating the weight between these tokens.

But this is, at a very basic fundamental level, how biological brains learn. It's not the whole story, but it is a part of it.

there's no actual intelligence, just really, really fancy fuzzy math.

You mean sapience or consciousness. Or you could say "human-level intelligence". But LLM's by definition have real "actual" intelligence, just not a lot of it.

Edit for the lowest common denominator: I'm suggesting a more accurate way of phrasing the sentence, such as "there's no actual sapience" or "there's no actual consciousness". /end-edit

an LLM would learn "2+2 = 4" by ingesting tens or hundreds of thousands of instances of the string "2+2 = 4" and calculating a strong relationship between the tokens "2+2," "=," and "4,"

This isn't true. At all. There are math specific benchmarks made by experts to specifically test the problem solving and domain specific capabilities of LLM's. And you can be sure they aren't "what's 2 + 2?"

I'm not here to make any claims about the ethics or legality of the training. All I'm commenting on is the science behind LLM's.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Bad argument.

It would hold water if their solution was proprietary and closed source. But it isn't, and anyone else, literally anyone, can take Proton and use it in their project for profit.

Even if they closed shop tomorrow, or even just gave up work on Proton itself, we'd all still reap the benefits at no cost to us.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is the point of E2EE. If anyone but the sender and receiver can see the messages then it's not E2EE. This is the part that politicians and governments don't understand (or just ignore). The idea that some designated authority can look at the messages when needed is entirely at odds with E2EE. It's as valid as true = false or 2 + 2 = cat.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Epic has exclusivity on release

Wait, really? It's officially off my list now. Screw those guys.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Find me another company that supports open source and Linux the way Valve does... I'll wait

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No digital game store is worth your loyalty.

When that store is run by a company that contributes massively to open source and works harder and puts more money into enabling alternate platforms for gaming than all other companies combined; ya, they have my loyalty.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I would love to see reasonable competition to steam which would give consumers and developers better options

No one's going to compete with and outdo Steam with Linux support.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

How do you moderate something you can't know about?

view more: ‹ prev next ›