Christobootswiththepher

joined 1 week ago

Good on you. It takes courage.

[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How do you mean?

Fuck, this is good!

So this could be interpreted as ban big advertising from ads?

I think ultimately tightening of ad standards is likely the middle ground. I for one am sick of the blatant bulletin. As an industrial chemist even the freakin chemical companies do it. Like buddy, I'm a chemist, I need to know what it is to use it properly. I have now started running a campaign where if they don't cough up the deets, I (in consultancies) don't recommend the use of their products.

Emotional pollution Mind pollution SOUL POLLUTION

I concur.

Some places limit advertising more than others. Banned on footpaths and dangerous spots. What about sales persons? How do you brand a product? I think it would have to be well defined.

I am ok with technical information being provided by a staff member. So much shit is peddled through marketing. As the scientist designing the product, I want to tell them the truth, customers love the truth, in this regard. I think banning deception and conning further would be a good way. And fuck this debt model of economics. And how about universities turn back into noble education organisations, not cocksucking psuedo-businesses.

I think govts/politicians like keeping the vague open because they use it, too. Their propaganda departments are cucked with good fact checking teams.

Reporting for duty, sir!

Welcome, c'mon in outta the cold. There's a warm spot of ere

Who like to fuck more than be considerate parents

view more: next ›