CooperRedArmyDog

joined 2 years ago
[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

look even 1 billion is more than enough to live on for a lifetime and then quite a bit left over, so that is not really that dumb

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

you see here the thing is "I Take" you did the thing,

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I would say nither, agian there profit is direct theft from there workers I see no reason to enable said theft by turning off my add block or not bypassing a paywall

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Look man he is a kid he is trying to suport adblocking, I do not expect him to try to find a way to anonomusly send it to uBO, he will search adblock and pay it... not saying its a good choice, I am saying its a choice I would expect a child who is trying there best to make

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Yes but you cannot donate to uBlock, so he is doing the best he can

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I would hardly call any of this steeling, The authors of the articles and the people needed to maintain the website are not being given the full value of there labor, they are already being stollen from, I do not care if the big company cannot make as much money, there profit is the theft of employee wages

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean thats bullshit, because they are being told move left, and they are saying "well we dont know how left so we are going to move right vote for us your your terrible" that is not the way to handle this. You start to move left and you will gain more voters, and if you keep moving you will find the point that satifies most of them.

You are very likely to lose votes by doing this, see the decreased voter turn out, and the varuable voter turn out, you are losing people as they stop approving of you, and the likelyhood of you gaining new voters shrinks as you chace a narrower and narrower market

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

you see 1 is the smaller number so clearly it is what we must kill /s

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

For legal reasons I am not sure I should state the amount of fist fights I have been in on the internet

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

except the slice of the pie being argued over is so small now, you have to get the group of people who vote republican, but are willing to conseve of voting for the democrat, and then pull them off ...

the math does not add up when to the left of democrats there is a large untapped market, you can see some of this by the lesser evilism argumentation, that there are people once agian near the drop off point of being able to approve of the democratic canidate. Even one step to the left would open up a large amount of voters back up, aswell as father sure up and engage the base, allowing for a more energetic and larger voter turnout.

also agian... the staffers and cheney should be enough given no denouncement or rejection of the endorsement to get anyone who was alive during those times who was opposed to them to keep from supporting harris, or atleast question the suport

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I thought we had all agreed that we punch nazis? LIke was this not the agreed apon reaction. If you had something more dangerous than a fist I would say you could use that... but this feels overly cowardly

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

you merely posted a link aserting that it was credible, I said that it was not, no one has presented a link over the credibility, my argument is that basic media litericy shows that this has severe biases and not truthful, you have provided nothing, we are still operating under asertions

view more: ‹ prev next ›