Cyberspark

joined 9 months ago
[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

No, the people that invent it will just never tell anyone. If we find out about it it'll because people were killed to keep it secret.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet maybe just don't sell your soul to any company?

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago

Weird coming from the company that deliberately stop selling to 170 countries for unknown reasons.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago

It's not even comparable, he didn't make something and it wasn't good, he broke what was already good. Imagine an artist adding a track to an old album and it distorting the quality of the rest of the tracks. That's what he did.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My tired brain read "Russian". My bad

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, that's my ignorance then. Woops.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

~~Being judgemental of and prejudice against people based on where they're born. I'm sure there's a word for that...~~

I can't read and lacked context. I can only apologise

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

If you don't R&D you can't tell the difference between what's shit and what just looks like it'll be shit.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Still no, because woke is something specific to the ideal of making people aware of real injustices.

Your original statement equates to "this is a deliberate attempt to push an agenda"

Even with replacing propaganda you still end up with "this promotes making people aware of real issues". Which implies 1 - an acknowledgement of the fact that they're real issues depicted (which such people usually contest) and 2 - that the author was aware of such issues in their effort to depict these things realistically.

In the end we all know that what they're saying is "this shows me something that I don't like because it doesn't fit with my vision of the world"

People can be wrong about intent and about content, but people can't be wrong about how it affects them and what messages they receive.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Not really a fair comparison when The Order 1886 dev had delusions of grandeur about his vision. About 30 fps, 1080p, repeatedly removing player agency, the QTEs everywhere, the letterbox fov that made people ill playing it, the terrible AI. The game being short was just the least of the games problems. As I recall people were done with the game even before 5 hours in.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Propaganda implies intent

view more: next ›