Sign my petition, damn it!
DarkenLM
joined 1 year ago
The LOTR movie was full of absolute legends, from sir Ian suggesting lore accurate shots, to Christopher Lee showing Peter Jackson how people truly die when stabbed in the lungs.
Make it six Astronomical Units. Yeet them into the Sun.
However, do keep in mind that LLMs regularly pull language an library features out of their asses that have no direct correspondent in practice. I'd use the LLMs to generate small snippets of code, giving them a small and restricted set of requirements to minimize hallucinations.
I have to use W11, but I use ExplorerPatcher to make it bearable.
Alright. Then imagine I am a kitchen knife manufacturer. I make a kitchen knife and sold it. Someone uses that knife to murder someone. Am I responsible for the murder? Because I just reduced the argument you've been making this entire time, except I removed the engineering part from it.
I make programs. I make them according to a specification, which is defined by the client AND the management. After I make the program, it's out of my hands how the fuck it is handled. If one of those two parties use or modify the program in ways they didn't tell me, and which eventually result in disaster, because they didn't fucking tell me that they wanted to use it for those actions and I couldn't possibly predict it, should I be blamed when the program fails? Normal glass bottles weren't made to hold lava, why should I be blamed when someone uses the bottle to hold lava and ends up melting their hands?
Listen here, buddy. If you think I'm putting my ass on the line for the fuckers up in management, you're delusional. You're saying I should be criminally charged for decisions I didn't have any control over whatsoever? What happened at my previous company would have happened way sooner if I wasn't trying to hold the entire shit together, pulling all-nighters and going directly against direct orders. And I could have risked going to jail for it, because I cared about the innocents that would lose a lot of money should the program crash on them. And now you're saying my ethics are wrong, even after all I've done? You're completely delusional.
No matter how many times you hide behind the coward’s whine of “you don’t know anything about the real world, mate,” I will still know what ethics actually are.
Oh, so you're saying that everyone else with real experience on the field is completely wrong and you, who has never worked a day in the area and doesn't know shit about it, are the epitome of morality? Yeah, I'm siding with the engineers I know, who have been through the shit I know we have to endure constantly, rather than the idiot arguing that we are murderers for no clear reason.
Do you believe assassins should be let off the hook, and only the mafia bosses who hire them are responsible for those crimes?
If those assassins had the lives of their own families and their own on the line, yes, there are even laws for those cases, I wonder why. Maybe because people who actually studied ethics and worked with it for decades know that it isn't black and white.
If you take an action, it is your own responsibility. I don’t see how you can reasonably disagree.
In the situation I mentioned, I could either abandon the project entirely, which would have caused even more damage, or I could try to patchwork it until I was forced to stop. I chose the later. And you have the ignorance and the absolute nerve to tell me I am responsible for what happened? Get off your high horse buddy, because you and your twisted sense of ethics would have condemned many innocent people. Look no further than the British Post Office Scandal. Are the people who were condemned responsible for the error? Were the engineers? No, it was the suits that refused to admit that they might have rushed the engineers too much and the program was faulty.
Because capitalism and corporations don't care about the progress of humanity, they only care about making more money.
Germany saw first-hand what happens when a far-right party is elected through democratic ways. They have all the reasons in the world to try to prevent it again.
Now lets watch this technology become prohibitively expensive unless you plunge into a millionaire debt.
Look at this fancy guy using an abacus. Everyone knows the superior way is to harness your own mind as your computer.
It's extremely hard to give a machine a sense of morality without having to manually implement it on every node that constitutes their network. Current LLMs aren't even aware of what they're printing out, let alone understand the moral implications from that.
The day a machine is truly aware of the morality of what they say, in addition to actually understanding it, then we truly have AI. Currently, we have gargantuan statistical models that people glorify into nigh-godhood.