[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nobody wants to make and maintain an account for every place they want to pay something for.

They could have replaced "check" with "cash". Same idea.

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

You are implying that you're for the bans, or at the very least, that they're reasonable because of some nuance. You literally do that again here in this comment:

people that comment on this will probably have less information than necessary to make a reasonable argument.

The default conclusion that most will have is that banning homeless people is a really shitty thing to do. What extra info do we need to reasonably come to the conclusion? Where's the nuance? I even went and read the first half or so and skimmed the rest(because it seemed repetitive and is more lengthy than I wanted to read) but there's nothing there that even attempted to change my mind.

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I'd be thinking more about how they'd plan to do it. Trump does have the Secret Service.

But good luck impeaching a man who can make his enemies disappear with a waive of his hand.

Friend, that's why you just sign something in your office with the doors closed and not make it public.

Honestly, I didn't even think enough about the whole thing enough to realize that the President could possibly get away with murder. Wouldn't that make it an obvious ruling then? Could then appoint new judges to the Supreme Court. There would magically be a few openings all of a sudden after all. How is this ruling really something they're actually considering?

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

But the judge and prosecutors should know that this would happen right? I'm a tad above a layman but isn't it obvious that this would happen? It's so negligent I'm almost convinced that it was negligence. Or is it that they usually get away with this kind of thing?

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Goddamn, it really did hit Forbes. Now I'm really interested in how Respawn will handle this one.

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Does it really make sense to complain about fragmentation here when many distros are just downstream from others? I was on Pop! And have used Ubuntu but am on Debian at the moment. Nothing's really changed. I installed the same application versions, I'd read the same tutorials to get things done. What am I missing here?

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Well luckily for them, I wasn't ever gonna buy an HP printer anyway. Either way, what IP is there in a printer ink cartridge?

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

This has nothing to do with Linux. Gamers in general, the cast majority being in Windows, hate EGS. It makes contracts for exclusivity, the launcher is apparently atrocious and there's an almost inherent bias against any launcher/storefront that isn't Steam. You'll find those three reasons in just about any conversation about EGS.

And, to actually address your Linux theory, all I have to do is to open Heroic, sign in if I haven't already, download the game and run it through Proton, in exactly the same way I do on Steam. Epic's hate for Linux isn't really that much of a problem.

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

I've heard both, but I can't not rinse after brushing. Any taste of actual toothpaste in my mouth is unsettling to me.

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

No, we all say hiccup. FFS, googling "hiccough" essentially autocorrects to hiccup. If everyone spells it hiccup and also pronounces it hiccup, literally no one is using "hiccough".

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I turned it up thinking it would be some kinda disgusting sound from the maggots. It definitely wasn't that.

[-] Dexx1s@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

It was EAC, for the most part. Once EAC worked with Linux, Apex was one of the first to enable it. That is/was the case for a good bit of games

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Dexx1s

joined 8 months ago