Diogenes_Barrel

social justice is not just beliefs held by the population, it rests on economic foundations which were swept away by the fall of the warsaw pact.

Necromancer: i will never stop restarting the Tolkein struggle session :sicko-pig:

its not necessarily a yank's fault they're uneducated about what their country has done but anyone who lacks the compunction to ask "why is this person chanting death to america?" and not take their answer from a idiot news host 'they hate us for our freedoms'---these people don't deserve a voice on the meaning of a slogan from a country they know nothing about in a language they don't speak.

(also im not DtB im just defending the formula, which especially should be unproblematic here because we're aware of the context of the phrase)

the iranians have never meant "yankees should be genocided" death to has always been about opposition to imperialism and neocolonialism.

some navel-gazing arrogant americans think half the world literally wants them dead but they're the most incurious hateful people imaginable so their opinion doesn't really count on whether victims of the yankees' slogans hurt their feelings

:shocked-pikachu: whaaaaaaaaat???

ive always suspected this, its just socially acceptable to be racist about animals who can't punch you in the mouth

im not going to pretend US culture was ever anything so high as to be able to experience 'decline'. film sucks, art sucks, mostly because capitalism fucks it up but some of it don't work in ideal conditions either

we've never had communism. why do we need to fetishise art from a capitalist past with the same conditions making it awful that make it awful today?

directly compare 2019 with 1994.

this is not close to extensive, these are films millions of people watched and some millions quite liked or thought was decent.

i don't think i've ever been accused of neoliberalism for watching way too many movies before but that's a good bit

i am begging you to test this hypothesis and going and watching every release from [any period in the past] not just the ones which are beloved enough to warrant rereleases and streaming contracts. film is a graveyard of creative bankruptcy and low effort exploitation.

even the USSR has a backcatalogue of cheap imitation and trendfollowing bullshit

a culture notably devoid of market forces circa 1992.

don't get me wrong most of what comes out now is still horseshit, it just used to be too. collective memory separates the chaff and gives people an incomplete picture of whatever era they're nostalgia-ing

it was different before! it was more artistic 20 years ago!

:thonk: which is what they were saying 20 years ago. and 20 years before that. Snobs have been complaining about lowbrow pushing out highbrow since like, the advent of the talky. And then in a couple decades it gets reappraised as 'oh that schlock we were hating on is actually Super Art and the shit coming out now doesn't compare'.

But they can never talk about why this is, even though its obvious and has been the same fucking process the entire time. Hollywood has always always always been about getting asses in seats, never artistic achievement. You want to see what artist-lead film is go back in time to the fucking Soviet Union.

God these nostalgia hogs make me sick

id prefer a good actor with a strange affect to an authentic-but-awful american tbh.

the american? actors in that movie were soooo bad. it hurt to watch.