Stop pushing your personal religious beliefs on someone who chose a different path or find someone else pre-aligned with your faith as not to cause conflict.
Ebby
joined 2 years ago
Totally agree with what you said. It was just easier to get a point across pointing at TrumpCo.
No way in hell he's top dog in this shit show, just a gullible fool of hate and piss.
Trump has a team of people who dedicated time, energy, and resources, to find a loophole around a ban on torture.
That sums up this administration's direction pretty succinctly.
Since downloading copyright material is legal for training apparently, I'd be glad to help train a privacy respecting distributed LLM. 😉
/s of course. But you have a very interesting idea!
OMG a rock! How horrible! Imagine if Jan 6 happened today.
California did not vote for Donny Dumbass. Retaliation on blue states is part of the Trump agenda.
(Though he's pissed off a couple red states too)
It feels dirty rooting for LA from the north bay but go LA! Grrrr...
(We have a great sports rivalry in this state for those who need context) ;)
I guess I should have worded that better. The danger is to the citizens defending our immigrant community from ICE raids.
Americans will die under Trump in other ways too like measles, lack of healthcare, food insecurity, pollution, violence, etc.
Media attention benefits the Trump agenda and the point is to set off the powderkeg. There is no deescalation.
To cause a riot is the point; that's why punishment for objecting to agents was fortified as soon as the turd defiled the white house.
Americans will die, but only those who oppose Trump's agenda.
Ditto to your comment except power usage. I moved my Plex/Jellyfin (and hopefully Immich soon) docker containers to an N100 for the hardware acceleration. TDP is 6 watts on some of these devices and CPU use sits around 2% unless Plex is doing DB optimizations (about 60% for a bit). I haven't measured consumption or my older server, but I feel moving some CPU intensive services to hardware GPU is saving a few watts.
We all get to fight AI tax prep now haha. All they have to do is send notices, it's up to you to provide the man-hours.
If I understand this study correctly, this is an increase of 11-14 bike commuters per mile of bike lane with a population density of 2,750 a square mile.
My city has 400 miles of bike lanes, therefore we should see an uptick in 5,600 riders?
I'm not sure how this study anticipates other factors limiting utilization such as economic status, weather, or city population size/density but it stands to reason that while a few more bike commuters can be coaxed out of hiding, there are very likely diminishing returns for investment costs and with 2 data points, the projected trajectory is not as linear as the study implies.