EmptySlime

joined 1 year ago
[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe I worded something poorly there and caused some miscommunication. I was responding to someone equating unverified with made up. What I was trying to say is that it's unverified right now because the only statements on it were from what seems to be the same primary source(s) that wish to remain anonymous. That doesn't necessarily mean the reporting is false, only that there hasn't been a separate source saying the same thing. I wasn't trying to say "it's true actually, they just have to say it's unverified because no one wants to put their name on saying it"

I then separately wanted to explain what seems to be the thought process behind people saying that Biden wouldn't endorse Kamala going into the convention if he dropped out.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

I believe that is Revy from Black Lagoon.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

There it is. Yeah that tracks with the general Republican playbook. Sell off any and every part of government that business interests could even remotely squeeze money out of no matter how detrimental it would be for society.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Doesn't AccuWeather also depend on NOAA data? I was under the impression that they basically just parse the stuff that NOAA/NWS puts out and make people pay to have convenient access to it. Am I misremembering something?

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

My partner hates when I open bananas like this because there's a little dark part of the banana under that end of the peel that she calls "The Ban-anus" and thinks it's gross even if I pick off that part and don't eat it.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

Yep. Now I'm not gonna lie, I didn't think they'd actually fully overturn Roe in the Dobbs decision either. I figured upholding the 15 week or whatever ban with maybe some meaningless language about exceptions beyond that time was the most likely outcome from Dobbs. But I wasn't at all surprised when it happened. I knew as soon as they had a good excuse to do it they'd overturn Roe.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Generally yes vasectomy is safer. But if they're planning to give birth via c-section for whatever reason for example, then in practical terms there's basically no additional risk. Plus neither method is totally effective. So if you can both get fixed you have much better chances of not getting pregnant accidentally.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

We moved hospitals for the birth of our twins to find one that was willing to tie her tubes when they took the twins out. She ended up having to have a hysterectomy for other reasons later but them being willing to tie her tubes during the c-section was a big part of our decision on doctors to see.

My mom had a hell of a time getting her tubes tied after my brother was born. She had to argue with the doctor for a while to eventually get it done. Gave her the old "What if you change your mind later?" line in like 5 different variations. The one that really angered me though when she told me the story was "What if something happens to one of your children?" Like you were just replacing a busted TV or something.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

For a couple reasons. Some cynically wanted to continue to use abortion as a political football. Codifying Roe in any meaningful way in their minds would have meant they had to find a new wedge issue to drive turnout and donations. We saw this on the other side when SCOTUS actually overturned it and the right didn't know what to do with themselves for a while.

Then maybe in part because of the former, there were a bunch of people that naively didn't believe they'd actually entirely destroy Roe. They genuinely thought the worst that could possibly happen was some minor restrictions at the margins. So those people were not motivated enough to actually do something about it.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

Specifically the character from The Ring movie. The person whose specific vengeful spirit haunts the video tape. It's been ages since I've seen it but I think they changed her name to Samara in the international release but in the original Japanese film the person whose ghost haunts the tape is named Sadako.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No shortage of Christian terrorism. Just ask any abortion clinic nurse.

The clinic that did the selective termination that saved my twins' lives had to be so cloak and dagger about their stuff that we literally had no idea we were showing up to the termination until they're wheeling my wife back to surgery. It's one of the only clinics in the state that even does the procedure we needed to my knowledge. That's how many bomb threats, arson and assassination attempts they deal with.

view more: ‹ prev next ›