Erika2rsis

joined 2 years ago
[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

(IANAD) A trans woman with neither estrogen nor testosterone in her system wouldn't begin to masculinize, but she would experience menopause-like symptoms such as hot flashes or risk of osteoporosis. This is why generally even after orchiectomy or SRS, trans women will still take estrogen for their entire lives, even though they no longer need to take an antiandrogen to prevent masculinization.

If a trans woman does have testes, and stops taking both estrogen and the antiandrogen, then she will gradually begin to masculinize. My understanding is that trans women will sometimes stop taking hormone therapy for up to several months for things like banking sperm, so it's not like forgetting to take your hormones for a few days is a major crisis. But going without hormones for extended periods of time is also not particularly fun.

That said, there are trans people who never take hormones, or who stop taking hormones, or who temporarily or permanently lose access to hormones, for any number of reasons, and their transitions aren't any less transitions for it. For trans men with CAIS, for instance, taking testosterone would have no effect on their bodies, but this doesn't make them any less men.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago

"You know, that 1% of annoying radical leftists will drive away the rest of Lemmy's user base."

"YES, IT'S BRILLIANT, KATHLEEN, AND FAIR PLAY TO THEM! GREAT LADS!"

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago

Columbo addressing his ancestor, lol

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Come to think of it, it could've also been that that community maybe actually did show up in the sh.itjust.works search results when you searched for just "piracy", but that the community was lower down on the page and sort of blended in with the other results, so you didn't notice it.

You can try searching just "piracy", and then choosing "communities" from the drop-down menu just to the left of the "subscribed" button. That should make the search results show only communities, so that it's harder for communities to get buried by or hidden among irrelevant results.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Try searching for !piracy@lemmy.ml on sh.itjust.works while logged in.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile, deaf-blind people:

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"What is or isn't politics is itself a political question" mfers when my politic is that nothing is political, there is only what the Irish call craic

Thoughts on George Habash? —He was a good doctor innit

Thoughts on the GERD? —It's a marvel of engineering innit

Thoughts on indigenous language education? —I like flicking through the Dakota dictionary sometimes. I don't understand any of it but yeah

Thoughts on the South China Sea? —yummy fishies there innit

Thoughts on trans people using public restrooms? —I'll answer your question with another question: why's it called a "public" restroom when you aren't shitting out in the open?

Thoughts on the world's interlocking systems of marginalization, exploitation, and oppression, including the core contradiction between the working and owning class, causing the slow demise of the planet under a world order which can only justify itself through unsustainable constant growth? —Them systems can't be reformed innit (※this opinion is apolitical because I have declared it to be common sense.)

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For me, when a picture doesn't load on my Lemmy app (Liftoff), if I go back to the post about an hour or so later, it loads just fine. And as said, clicking on "view post in browser", then the picture will load just fine there, too. So it's a really weird problem that in my impression is specific to Lemmy apps.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

This happens sometimes for me too. You can try opening it in browser, but I'll write a transcription for our screen-reader-using friends, too.

Transcription:


tlirsgender | Nov 6, 2020

Weird peeve time. Calling lab grown gemstones "fake" is stupid because it's the same shit just not formed naturally. An artificially grown diamond is the same shit as a natural diamond it is the exact same material bro it's all fuckign carbon


spacefroggity | 45m ago

It's carbon it's pretty and it didn't involve slave labor what's not to love??? Hi I'm having geology opinions tonight apparently. And I'm right


spacefroggity | 45m ago

There is so much bullshit in the diamonds industry to be mad about tbh. It also ties into the bullshit of the wedding industry as a whole but we don't have the time to unpack all that


val-ritz | Nov 29, 2020

not even going to lie, the day i learned i could get like 15 lab grown rubies the size of dimes for $20 is the day i spent $20 on rubies, and i have never once said to myself "man, i wish this cost $1,600 and the lives of eight children to produce


fuckyeahmineralogy | Dec 8, 2020

We are a pro-lab-grown mineral blog here, not only is it massively cheaper but massively more ethical as well in many cases.


thegreenpea | Mar 8, 2021

another very cool lab grown gem is Moissanite. It has a 9.25 on the mohs hardness scale where diamond is a 10. Moissanote also has a 2.69 refractive index in comparison to diamond's 2.419 and here is the difference

Diamond on left and moissanite on right: moissanite's refraction consists of long, thin beams almost in rainbow colors, whereas diamond's refraction has shorter, thicker, whitish beams

and the best thing about moissanite? It is all lab grown and it costs only a fraction of what diamond costs. So fuck the diamond indsutry and buy lab grown gems which cost significantly less


rubixpsyche | Aug 6, 2021

Also it's just cool to think of some mad scientist lookin person doing shit against the law of the universe and making pretty gems for you. Like cmon. This shouldnt be allowed probably. But humans really be like on gOD i want some shiny an just started MAKIN em


dadzathechaosgod | 46m ago

for years people wanted alchemy, well now we have alchemy and we're making gemstones out of it and suddenly "it doesn't count" anymore

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

And you don't seem to understaaa-aaand

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I guess another way to put it is that "i.e." is more specific while "e.g." is more general. So "i.e." carries an energy of "I am referring very specifically to the following" while "e.g." means "there are other things that I'm not mentioning". So the use of "i.e." in the Tumblr post would imply that "tattoo", "sushi", and "guillotine" are the only loanwords in the English language.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Anyone looking to remember the difference: "id est" (that is) vs "exemplī grātiā" (for the sake of an example). You use the first to clarify meaning, and the second to begin a non-exhaustive list of examples.

What matters is ultimately if you can convey your ideas, so using the wrong term is fine when people can still figure out what you meant. But it's still a good idea to learn the difference, because there will be times when mixing up "i.e." and "e.g." will create ambiguity or misunderstanding.

The best idea is maybe to use "for example" or "that is to say". The former could be abbreviated to "f.ex." like in Norwegian, and the latter could be abbreviated "t.i.t.s."

...Alright, on second thought maybe don't abbreviate that one.

In any case, the Wikipedia Manual of Style recommends avoiding use of "e.g." and "i.e." in regular running text altogether, saying that these abbreviations are better fit for parentheticals, quotations, citations, tables, and lists. This is because there is no word or character limit on Wikipedia, nor is there on Tumblr, and so the language is more clear when abbreviations are avoided. Even when someone is using "i.e." and "e.g." in the prescribed way, that doesn't guarantee that the reader knows the distinction.

view more: ‹ prev next ›