Dismantling the regime. If someone said we need to eliminate the Chinese Communist regime, would you think they want to destroy the entirety of China?

Things like "MP approves funding for new hospital" don't make headlines. Even moreso for any world headlines to rise above the din of American politics it usually has to be something pretty outrageous.

Life's pretty good here in Australia. No neighbours on the border causing problems, weather is generally good, lots of wide open empty nature to get out of the city, average salary is $93k and unemployment is low, crime is low. Inequality is a problem although our Gini coefficient has actually lowered recently. There's a lot of life to enjoy, and really the endless stream of negativity is only experienced through the media, not in real life, so I switched off the TV and just focus on what's going on around me, enjoying the people, places and activities that I like, and things feel quite positive.

Turn off the news, it's bad for the psyche.

Twitter has always sucked and destroying it at his own expense is the one good thing Musk has done. He should buy Facebook next.

Mouth open, shadow on chin - they turned their logo into a soyjak

Seems fitting tbh

Everyone talking about hacking the firmware to extract the private key

Me just taking a photo of the deepfake

If that MRI machine is in use then that gun can't have been there very long, the extremely powerful magnetic field means metal objects can not be present in the same room while the machine is active.

Pluck your eyelashes and get them transplanted onto your head. Problem solved.

I notice you never denied jerking it to your particularly socially unacceptable kink... 🤔

"You should let criminal acts go unpunished so your side can do them too" is certainly a hot take

The drug and cigarette analogy is dramatic, but the real heat is going to come from the claim that they only care about the supply side of the equation, not demand. In other words, their audience is locked in and has no power, and the ad suppliers (Google themselves) set the market conditions.

That is dangerously close to monopoly talk.

I doubt

I'd wager

I'd assume

You have a news article linked here which clearly spells out an example of this happening yet you still lean on assumptions that it couldn't possibly happen