Evinceo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago

When the music stops can't MS just let OpenAI go bankrupt and keep the tech?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

RIP rationalist moonshot. Takes a special kind of SV-libertarian brainrot to think the world will be saved by a company. Do we have EY's reaction yet?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

They did do one on Yud, it's hard to find and has an annoying amount of side chatter but it's a pretty solid breakdown of the dude.

The episode is mentioned here: https://shatterzone.substack.com/p/rationalist-harry-potter-and-the

But I can no longer find it on YouTube.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago

Every TC article I've seen recently is furious jerking about how totally legal AI is and how it will finally defeat the copyright Great Satan.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 1 points 4 weeks ago

Do you have an article about this?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

<I ain't reading all that.jpg>

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe he realized it wasn't important after all.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago

He's exactly the Gilfoyle looking mother fucker you think he is.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago

Eagerly awaiting the writeup.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago

Jibo, Juicero... it is possible to get one's hands on one of Theranos's machines?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meta: reddit sneerclub appears to be open again. Is this an authorized action or has Reddit scabbed it?

 

The actually not even really a hatchet job NYT piece on SlateScott that mostly just called him a weird little guy has nonetheless created a festering psychic wound that oozes to this day. Here manifests as an interview with the author on LW. See also: discussion on reddit.

My favorite section, talking about how people are mad that be brought up Scott's notorious race stuff™️:

CM: That's great. That's a valid position. There are other valid positions where people say, we need to not go so close to that, because it's dangerous and there's a slippery slope. The irony of this whole situation is that some people who feel that I should not have gone there, who think I should not explore the length and breadth of that situation, are the people who think you should always go there.

 

Hounding the president of Harvard out of a job because you think she's a DEI hire is one thing, but going after a Billionaire's wife? How dare these journalists! What big bullies.

Bonus downplaying of EA's faults. He of course phrases the Bostrom affair as someone being "accused" of sending a racist email, as if there were any question as to who sent it, or if it was racist. And acts like it's not just the cherry on top of a lifetime of Bostrom's work.

 

Utilitarian brainworms or one of the many very real instances of a homicidal parent going after their disabled child? I can't decide, but it's a depressing read.

May end up on SRD, but you read it here first.

view more: next ›