ExtremeDullard

joined 3 days ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 36 minutes ago

Right okay I undertand. Thanks!

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Then, go over to the community on piefed, and near the bottom of the sidebar, there is a link to "Retrieve a post from the original server".

Some posts seem to not be retrievable, yet they exist when you follow the canonical links and the Lemmy instances aren't blocvked.

This one for instance:

https://pawb.social/comment/13985010

Any idea why?

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago

Surely you mean A1...

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 11 points 5 hours ago

With Trump and his sycophantic appointed hacks, "If you hire clowns, you get a circus." has never held more true.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the overall score was reflected on those original posts piefed.social mirrored by itself. So it did work at least once. It's those extra posts I forced Piefed to retrieve manually that all came with the default score of 1.

Like I said, it doesn't really matter. But ideally when I finally decide to relocate the communities, I'd like the Piefed copies to be identical. But the scoring is not important: what I really care about is the content and that made it across, now that I finished the retrieve job manually. So it's all good.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's almost as if rich Republicans were terrible people...

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Wow thanks. It's less obvious than the Youtube video makes it out to be.

Your comment should be stickied somewhere.

EDIT: I'm retrieving posts from the original SDF community one by one (good thing it's a small community with low bandwidth 🙂) and I notice that, while the posts appear, the original downvotes/upvotes aren't. copied over. I don't really care, but I figured I'd mention it.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social -1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

You should write to your reps that banking apps be mandated to support multiple operating systems outside the duopoly.

Yeah... Good luck with that. This is beyond naive.

Your rep doesn't give a shit about monopolies or duopolies (if they did, Google and Apple would have had their collective ass Sherman'ed into a million itty bitty pieces a long time ago) and they don't care about your privacy and how you feel about it.

All your rep cares about - if you're lucky - is more mainstream topics like taxes, employment, housing, education etc. And more likely, all they care about is lining their pockets and winning the next election to line their pockets some more.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Food pedants aren't gullible. They know full well water isn't worth anything like the price it's sold when it's bottled. But they're pedants: it's their job to look sophisticated. They literally make a living out of talking bullcrap about food.

That's why I said: if they want to pay silly money for water, they're welcome to. What I oppose if ordinary people listening to them and getting taken for a ride next time they go out for dinner.

But I think reasonable people won't fall for that one. It's just too stupid on its face. And people who are too dumb to know water is just water, well... a fool and his money...

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 18 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

That's a blatant scam for self-appointed restaurant critics and other food pedants.

Let them be scammed. Why not... I have nothing against taking money from fools, so long as they don't convince reasonable people to do the same.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (8 children)

As for automatic deletion of older posts...this is something that a piefed admin can do on a community by community basis. When it is turned on for a community, that retention policy is listed in the community sidebar. For instance, if you look at the sidebar of !anime@ani.social, you will see that posts are retained on piefed.social for 365 days.

Okay then it's fine. I was afraid it was a compulsory thing. I wouldn't consider importing my Lemmy communities on Piefed if it forgot old post.

Pulling in those 50 posts works most of the time but sometimes, for unknown reasons, it fails and only some posts get mirrored.

Okay. Well I was just curious. I suppose all the posts will show up after I migrate the communities over here.

Thanks!

8
submitted 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by ExtremeDullard@piefed.social to c/piefed_help@piefed.social
 

How come this Lemmy community only shows the last 15 posts / 10 months worth of posts on Piefed?

This community or this community (from the same Lemmy instance) too are clipped, but they both show a year's worth.

Does it have something to do with the date at which the first PieFed user join them?

I know Lemmy instances only start mirroring a community hosted on another instance when someone on that instance joins it. But after that someone joined and the instance is done mirroring the community, the whole of it is browseable.

If I had to guess, I'd say Piefed instances only mirror the 15 last posts after the first user joins, or a years's worth, whichever applies. Correct?

And if so, does this also apply to native Piefed communities? In other words, does Piefied "disappear" older posts in Piefed communities?

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago

Strange... Usually Trump hacks who screw up get an ambassadorship. This one must have been exceptionally bad, which is saying something considering how low the bar is to be a Trump appointee.

 

Hey all,

I'm evaluating PieFed as a replacement for Lemmy, with a view to importing my two Lemmy communities to move them out of the failing Lemmy instance they're currently hosted on (a PieFed exclusive I understand). I've created an account and imported my Lemmy settings yesterday, and so far it's been more or less smooth sailing.

But there's one showstopper for me: when I create a post, there's no field to specify the thumbnail image URL. When PieFed guesses the image URL correctly, no problem. But here, I just posted this YouTube video, and just like on Lemmy half of the time, the thumbnail image didn't get picked up. On Lemmy, I always manually insert the thumbnail URL when I post YouTube links for that reason.

Similarly, some sites make it extra-hard for software to correctly guess the og:image - Reuters for instance - and so in those cases when it doesn't work, I manually set the correct thumbnail URL too.

Here on PieFed, there doesn't seem to be a provision to set the thumbnail URL.

Am I doing something wrong? Am I missing something obvious? I really doubt this basic functionality is missing from PieFed.

 

See? Not all AI is bad.

view more: next ›