FamousPlan101

joined 3 years ago
[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

It signs solidnet.org statements.

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 44 points 10 months ago (16 children)

The leader is very unpopular, his approval rating is currently 20% approval, 71% disapproval according to Morning Consult, reaching lows of 18% approval, 75% disapproval.

Also there have been strikes against neoliberalism, US robbing the country, anti-war protests and getting the president to resign. Ryomyong.com covers resistance to him. http://ryomyong.com/index.php?page=south

As for a SK communist party, there's http://pdp21.kr/ but it's small, there's also Anti-Imperialist National Democratic Front which is an underground DPRK org in SK.

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

"Serbia against violence" which tried a color revolution failed to gain a majority.

https://www.rt.com/news/589640-serbia-color-revolution-attempt/

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

With a population of 804,567 and an active "army" of 4600 active personnel and 3000 reserves (2 brigades)

Compared to a country with a population of 28.2 million with an army of 115,000

Even if they conscript 1% of their population (in the short term) that's only another 2 brigades

Do you think their society will have the morale to fight as though the US invaded them with a Latin American neighbour? To me it seems that the many leftists in Guyana would be apathetic.

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Way more than that.

Here's a really good breakdown, it's 66% fake according to this

https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/us-economic-statistics-unreliable-numbers/

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ukraine talks about territorial integrity and say that this is their land and the Russian-speaking majority should leave but ...

Recognizes Ichkeria (Chechnya, where no one is fighting for it lol) from Russia on the basis of "self-determination" at the expense of Russia's territorial integrity

Tend to support Kosovar "self-determination" against Serbia against their territorial sovereignty

Supports settlement of Palestinian land (recognized by 138 countries, 7 billion people)

Support Yaroslav Hunka who fought with the nazis for "self-determination" against Soviet territorial sovereignty

And then they support "Israeli territorial sovereignty" just like they support their own as the Slavic Israel.

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Voice also won't do anything though. If politicians want to hear the voice of the people they can go listen to them.

The companies ruining indigenous land have been financing the voice referendum, an advisory body like that could easily be used to justify themselves. It's gone that way before. "Progressive No" has the best opinions, listen to Lidia Thorpe and those that put treaty first, both sides want to assimilate indigenous people into settler colonial society. Both a yes and no victory will be a success for the racists.

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russia would have left Ukraine to pre-February 24 borders on April 1, 2022 if west agreed

https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2022/09/03/west-peace-proposal-ukraine-russia/

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can find other sources corroborating this. I get that CLINTEL is shady but what they say can be corroborated. I haven't looked at everything on their site so there may be some wacky stuff (I do regret using it as a source) but my point is the modeling can't explain everything.

Point is: the Earth is cooling a lot in the Eastern Pacific and southern ocean and there's an alternative Russian theory that suggests that holes in the ozone layer are the main cause of climate change not CO2. It will be likely discussed at the world stage at COP this year.

This is an article from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists corroborating the CLINTEL article on climate change not having been as severe as predicted, with a strong cooling trend in the Eastern Pacific and Southern Ocean:

https://thebulletin.org/2022/12/whats-wrong-with-these-climate-models/

Take, for example, ocean warming. Despite criticisms from climate change skeptics, global climate models have accurately predicted rising average sea surface temperatures, which are extremely important to predicting the intensity of climate change. But observations in recent decades show that changes in sea surface temperatures vary greatly by region. That geographic variation suggests that end of century global warming may be less severe than most climate models suggest. These observations do not invalidate climate modeling, but they do highlight the importance of regular comparisons between climate models and the real-world observations they aspire to reflect.

She adds that observed trends show a strong cooling trend in the Eastern Pacific and Southern Ocean, which goes against what the models predicted.

view more: ‹ prev next ›