What's the point of a summary that's longer than the article itself?
FiskFisk33
that is not the image you showed.
they're a type of eagle candy.
looks fine to me, the problem is on your end, or it's intermittent somehow.
oh wow, he was a former soap star, i read the title as being about someone who stopped washing himself.
Me neither. I would have thought this was exactly the kind of situation impeachment was meant to stop. I am thoroughly confused.
two words: presidential pardon.
No one will spend the time, money and effort to prosecute these people when they can just wave the whole thing away with a signature.
Same, but "kalkon" in swedish.
I felt slightly smug before I learned that haha
so like, close, but no cigar.
That bird Is called Turkey in English
It's called India (translated) in Turkish, and many European languages
In India it is also named after Turkey
The Arabic word for it translates to East Africa
Malaysians call it Dutch Chicken
In Cambodia its French chicken
And the fucking bird comes from North America
hmm, true enough. But in my mind there's a clear difference between showing information unedited and referring to its source, and this.
A few friends of mine used to have a sms-based group chat we used for many years. One of those friends kept losing phones and getting new numbers. At some point one of his older numbers texted something to the tune of "what the fuck is this, why are you texting me?!". It turns out the old number had been reassigned.
then again, no state secrets were exchanged.