FriendOfDeSoto

Doesn't difficult very much depend on what you think matters? You're instantly missing out on anything app, anything QR-code related (ordering food in some restaurants, links, etc.), membership cards that no longer exist in physical form. Some places sell certain tickets online only and then you may need a printer or you're SOL. I'm sure in missing something so that's not extensive.

But at the same time, if you have a dumb phone, you can still stay in touch with friends and family. You'll be missing out on images being sent that are bigger than 2 pixels. But you wouldn't be completely out of the loop. And if you have an internet ready computer at home or at the next door library, just not on you at all times, I think that's crucial. Without that you're ending up in all sorts of trouble.

I would say it's doable if you are good at not giving F's. If at the same time you only want to use cash or just no credit cards you'll be making your life much harder though.

We must hang out in very different circles then.

Everybody draws their own vague red lines in the sand. There is no universal law. If you like it and it doesn't feel icky, go ahead and like it. If it feels icky, don't. Or make sure they get no money out of your enjoyment.

However socialized your health care system is, whoever works in it is more likely than not overworked and, the lower the rank, underpaid. I feel comfortable claiming this to be true in general.

This is one study in Poland. You could draw a number of conclusions from it that isn't just "so-called AI makes doctors dumber." It could be just as well that so-called AI has an edge over human eyes in finding cancer. It could also be that these doctors are relieved to have a tool that's reasonably reliable so they can focus their medicine brains on improving care in another area that this study didn't look at. They only have so much bandwidth and they are only human too. It's too early and too simplistic to leap to one conclusion.

And don't get me wrong. I have no trouble imagining that the dumber conclusion could be true. Practice makes perfect so I can see if they don't work that recognition muscle they'll lose it. Which would eff us all when computers break or greedy companies make access to the models financially impossible. This should sound alarm bells for the educators. But once again it is too early to say the sky is falling. And it may be the pressures of the health care system that at the very least aggravate the observed effect.

Flip a coin or start both on Duolingo and see which one interests you more. This is only a hard decision in your head. If you're not planning to move to somewhere where they speak either, this is just a hobby.

They are both romance languages so you'll find mental handholds in either language that can help you with the other. Similar conjugations, spellings, irregularities, etc.

The French you'll learn with internet resources or most text books will most likely be French French. As a learner, that will probably still make understanding the Quebecers an extremely hard task. It's like somebody from a Louisiana bayou talking to a Scottish highlander. On paper, they are both able to speak English but there are accents and differences in vocabulary that increase the level of difficulty, even for native speakers.

I want to live in a world where not everything this man baby says becomes news.

I don't think it will be a big win for the Palestinians. One reason why this hasn't happened in the past is that there is no reliable, functional government in place that governs over all of the territory. You had Hamas in Gaza and the PLO in most of the West Bank and they don't see eye to eye. This hasn't changed. It will be difficult for these established governments to cooperate with a a fractured non-functional one so the benefits for the Palestinian people will only be patchy and homeopathic.

So I fear recognizing a Palestinian state is actually an impotent, diplomatic gesture - like: "we see what's going on there, it's horrible, and we don't have the resolve to do anything else to bring Israel back to the status quo ante." It's finger wagging at Israel more than actual support for the Palestinians. It's a gesture that can easily be reversed as well, like the orange one moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. And I think that's why these announcements of recognition fall on very deaf ears in Tel Aviv. It's political theater for the audiences in the countries whose governments have announced this. "Look, we are doing something! (But we're doing not that much really, we could do other things as well, isolate the Israeli government and/or cut it off palpably from necessary economic and military supply chain support. But we won't. It's a complicated conundrum, that Middle East. And we're not quite ready to jeopardize the existence of Israel over this.)"

Become active in your local politics. That's where this urban design sausage is made. I'm gonna go ahead and doubt that your post here will reach many decision makers and urban designers.

The reason why you can't angle that parasol is because it will cost more money. Anything the public can use will be abused and then broken. We cannot have nice things.

Fixed typo

I think it is hard though, legislatively, as the RTBF already proves. It's a terribly vague set of rules that put search engines in the position where they have to evaluate a claim and then sit in judgement over it with little to no oversight and then only a public form of objection if this somehow ends up in a court. This is not a good process. Adding more reasons to use a bad process doesn't sound like a great idea regardless of how well intentioned they are.

An issue I see are massive Streisand effects. One is occurring if you need to take a Google to court for not following up on your RTBF claim. Nobody really cared about your drunk driving incident from 2019 until you fill the headlines with your court proceedings. Now everybody knows. The other is this: let's say Roberta became Robert. Calling him Roberta would be dead naming him. But if every time I framed it as "Robert Streisand (known until 2023 as Roberta Streisand)" I'm merely stating fact and I don't see how many courts will intervene against that. Why can virtually everybody still dead name Chelsea Manning? Because every time her name was mentioned post transition they added this factual context. So all you will achieve in the end is that all trolls and dickheads will just use the legally defendable boiler plate phrase. And hang a much brighter lantern on the issue.

Just to be clear: I'm not defending anybody deadnaming somebody else. I'm just looking at this issue, the RTBF, and I'm thinking of that road to hell and with what it is paved.

Never accept a pasta served by an "Australian mushroom."

I don't think the people who do the happiness statistic could see past the "forcibly inject" part.

No one here can tell you for sure what's wrong with your cable. So no one can answer if it will be good or bad over time. Slow (normal) charging is better for your battery than fast charging. A wobbly wire might stop and restart the charging process, which might be detrimental to the battery over time.

But it could also be that your port is so clogged up with pocket lint that the contact in your phone is affected and that's why fast charging no longer works. Something could be broken in the brick you use and that's why it won't work any more. It could be that the cable was bent so many times it's broken. It's probably that.

You could try to narrow down where the error lies. If you use a friend's cable does the same thing happen? Friend's fine-working cable in your power brick? If you got a phone repair kiosk in your neighborhood, maybe ask them if they could clean your port. If they're friendly, they can probably help you narrow down this problem also.