GuyFleegman

joined 8 months ago
[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

“Is Discovery canon?” is an interesting question because the only real purpose canon serves is to give us boundaries for where it’s reasonable to stop expecting (searching for?) a degree of consistency throughout all of Star Trek

When someone says “that’s not canon” what they’re usually telling you is that they don’t care to reconcile it with other Trek

Given that Discovery is two seasons of “top secret classified never happened” and three seasons of “800 years later than any other series,” even if we decided it was canon in some technical or legal sense, it gives us basically nothing that could potentially influence other Star Trek, before or since. In other words, it’s not canon in any practical or meaningful sense.

tl;dr yeah I guess you’re right

[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Shit man they had universal healthcare in Star Trek's 2024. In Star Trek's 2024 the tech billionaire decided to help the homeless. We're doing worse in the real world than what Star Trek depicted as being near the absolute nadir of human society.

 
 
[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago

It is, but I’ve seen this question asked earnestly so many times I just can’t tell anymore…

[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (11 children)

The hell could O'Brien have done to get such a reaction?

Nothing. Tom just wanted to scare O’Brien off. Tom was worried O’Brien knew Will well enough that an extended conversation would blow his cover.

[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago

Based and friendpilled

 
 
[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago

No one on your instance has subscribed to it, so it's not federating content in. If you subscribe, it will populate.

[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I agree it would be nice if people would post there more, which is why I’m suggesting it

[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You’re preaching to the choir. “Concede the point” is a figure of speech which means the speaker is going explore an assumption despite not believing it themselves.

My point is that the whole “capitalism is the best economic system we know about because humans are greedy” argument is sophistry. It doesn't even make sense in the context of its own flawed premise.

[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Let’s concede the point: humans are inherently greedy and selfish.

But greed and selfishness are bad, right? We want less greed and selfishness in the world.

Given these two assumptions—humans are greedy, greed is bad—shouldn’t we architect society to explicitly disincentivize greed?

 

Apologies for the delayed post, Lemmy.World has had some federation issues this week.

1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/div0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

/c/news@lemmy.world is the second biggest community on Lemmy.World and yet on /0, there is nothing newer than two days.

/c/technology@lemmy.world has two posts from today but based on the vote count, I think it's only showing votes from this instance

 

 

 
 

Very active post on LW: https://lemmy.world/post/12747897

Empty thread on db0: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/15749604

I had initially assumed it was a problem on LWs end... but other instances seem to be federating just fine:

https://lemm.ee/post/25817431

https://lemmy.ml/post/12793895

Just wanted to bring it to your attention. Not sure if this is on LWs end of db0's end.

 
 
 
view more: next ›