[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 23 points 1 month ago

Never thought I would see the day where Google crumbles, but they're actively sprinting towards it now.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 12 points 2 months ago

I really hope he has a plan to stay safe and also has a document saved with multiple people in the event of an 'unforseen sudden death'.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 8 points 4 months ago

Yeah, turns out moderating user generated content to guarantee it being safe for children is expensive.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 12 points 4 months ago

Yeah.. almost like they're stuck in a cycle of poverty and can't save enough money for a down payment for a house either.

So 'funny'.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 17 points 4 months ago

As someone who did, I understand the sentiment but it isn't that easy. I have so many friends and family members who are stuck there because they can't save enough resources to leave.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 15 points 4 months ago

DWI stands for Driving While Intoxicated, not Driving While Impaired. The restriction in the law is against "intoxicating liquor, cannabis, or any drug".

A heart attack is not liquor, cannabis or a drug, therefore, it is not reasonable to charge this woman with a DWI.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 21 points 4 months ago

We should refer to him as a convicted rapist all the time.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 16 points 5 months ago

So, openly admitting it was "quid pro quo". Cool.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

So, you objectify women, but you're gay, but you have sex with women, but aren't sexual with them, but find them extremely attractive, but..

What is the point here?

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

Or better yet - don't interview him at all. Do an exposé piece on him that details everything and run it primarily in his district if you want to actually affect change.

The fact that he's being interviewed only adds to his credibility, and no matter what happens here, people are going to think he's just misunderstood, since "He'd be in jail if this were all true, right?"

He should be.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

They also say that 'They do not want to track users across devices, so each device will count individually'. They say you can appeal large charges, but only if you can prove that it's a botnet or bad-faith actors. If it looks like random data, the developers are stuck with the bill.

[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

Now I can display the most visually appealing parts of my shoes! The soles!

In all seriousness, this would create a giant mess instantly. Imagine the mud stuck to the bottom of shoes just on display for anyone walking past.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

IzzyScissor

joined 1 year ago