Joncash2

joined 2 years ago
[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 hours ago

I see USA solving it's problems with their ancient traditions and sensibilities. Slavery. I'd say I'm surprised, but uh...

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Most of China's smuggling is through middle eastern countries. Which USA signed deals to give them more than they need. Which was already flagged as a problem, and promptly ignored by Trump's administration. But we are going to restrict Thailand and Malaysia? Both of which do not really buy AI chips to begin with. Why? And if USA is going to do this, why not ban Singapore. A nation that was caught smuggling chips to China several times? Someone make it make sense

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Oh jeez my bad. Anyway I actually hope William lai negotiates with China. China is clearly trying to buy time now and drag out negotiations to let the KMT get more power. I'd rather William negotiate as I think he'll get a better deal.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You brought up the second paragraph. You brought up Taiwan. I'm just calling KMT pro-China to be aggressive with you. But your actually right, I am surprised you knew even that much.

Edit I accidentally hit send. Here's the merger talk

https://youtu.be/QQCRmOPeHLM

I mean to say knew that much about the kmt

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Lol let me guess instead of fact checking me you'll tell me I can't speak English and hang up

https://youtu.be/JDR5itJtZU8

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Except even the president of Taiwan has already said he is willing to negotiate a merger. And the KMT is gaining in popularity, the pro-China party. Why would an invasion even be in the cards? Oh wait, you think that because you don't actually know what's going on in Taiwan at all but keep speaking for us.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kallas, the person sitting across the table literally said a few months ago that the EU will turn on China after taking care of Russia. Wang Yi is just saying USA because the US is even more blatant. Why, if you were China would you let Russia lose if everyone on the other side of that table keeps saying they're going after you once Russia is done?

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Not maybe, Wang Yi literally said we cannot let Russia lose because the US will pivot to China. It's a not subtle way of saying if you guys keep talking about taking out China, we obviously won't help you.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

As I said EU leaders, it's obviously not just Kallas. But really China's simply trying to create a rift with the US and EU. With Trump, they're hoping there's an opening. They don't really care if the EU supports China, they just hope they see the US as toxic. Which is why Wang Yi said China can't let Russia lose because USA will pivot to Asia, they want to make clear that is toxic thinking.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Well, this puts us well out of the realm of is what China saying evil, it's not it's just telling the EU to choose. And instead into the realm of grand strategy of nations. I would love to continue the conversation, but this will be rife with opinions and wild inaccuracies. I don't agree with what your saying but for me to explain would be long, as well as I can't be sure I am right.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ok well we are talking in the context of if true then EU should x. Well it's only true if the EU continues to want to confront China. China is simply saying that's up to you

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Again, this is in the context of Obama's pivot to Asia. China sees what your saying as excuses and wants the EU to prove their not just following US orders. Which you've said over and over again they won't decouple so China doesn't believe them.

view more: next ›