KeenFlame

joined 1 year ago
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 0 points 3 days ago

Astroturfing is when corpos pretend to be grassroots

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago

It could work when the algorithm was like that but they changed it to consider using users as test subjects for more lucrative users

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 1 week ago

Because only cowards would apply. Idiotic approach to the problem

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 8 points 1 week ago

Ohio ex sheriff*

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu -2 points 1 week ago

Being attacked by her new boyfriend while he tries to break into my apartment to take my 4 ear old, high on heavy drugs and psychotic

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 8 points 1 week ago

Together we are still powerless because of the economic guardrails and class culture

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They want more data and literally can't store it efficiently enough. You can read their eula and see, they instantly own anything you upload and you no longer have rights to it, which is absolutely bonkers and pretty dubious in many countries if this is even legal. We found out when they overviewed the security of our studio and we use other communication software now because of it. They could literally argue that they own the assets to the games we make if we send concepts to each other.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 2 weeks ago

That they don't collect as much user data is not enshittification. That is when greed kills it. They have been greedy a long time but not being able to hoard as much free user data is a good thing

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nice! They get less free identity data an own less copyright

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 2 weeks ago

They want your data, everything you upload to discord belongs to that corporation. Corporations do not have souls

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's probably because it's their property now and personal data is precious

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 2 weeks ago

No it's not

Next issue

view more: next ›