It's nothing so complicated as all that.
It's as simple as any possible solution to the issue is to Israels disadvantage, so they work to maintain the status quo.
Kepabar
joined 1 year ago
No one has suggested you would just execute a person on sight while they are under the influence.
In these situations there are interviews, evaluations and waiting periods to ensure the person is 'of sound mind' before proceeding.
So with that cleared up, I'll repeat my question.
Why should you get to be the arbiter of if someone else is allowed to die?
I still don't think that answers the question:
Why should anyone other than yourself be the arbiter of if your life should continue?
Nah, it's neither.
It's that while I do enjoy whatever it is, if it were to disappear because I'm ad blocking and won't sub then .. ohh well?
There are a select few groups I actually care about and I donate to them (like PBS).
Anything else will either find a way or die but I don't care which.
It's called qualified immunity.
The idea is that if a police officer accidentally violates someone's rights while trying to do their job and wasn't aware they are not at fault.
It's not a law but the result of a court case. Many of us want a law passed to remove it.
Yeah, but I didn't care about any of that.
The leadership of Gaza is Hamas. Unequivocally.
Hamas was elected to power then pulled the ladder up behind them suspending all future elections.
All officials in the Gaza government are Hamas.
Elections were suspended in the West Bank because there is a real chance Hamas would win an election there today.
This isn't a case of a tyrannical overlord ruling over the Palestinian people without their consent.
Most supported and still support the organization.
Naw, lots of us stopped when Netflix streaming came in full swing.
A link to the past is my top Zelda game for sure.
... Have you ever tried the randomizer for it? It will give you a rom where all the items are randomly distributed around the map, making you do the whole sequence out of order.
I will play though a random Rom one a year or so and it's a blast.
Alright. This isn't an attack, honestly.
You obviously have some sort of chip on your shoulders and an anger management problem.
You are going to continue to run into this problem in any community you interact with until you address it.
I really, really recommend you look into anger management counseling.
Again, I'm not saying this for me. I'm saying it for you.
Yes we go by preponderance of evidence.
Essentially it's 'whoever you Believe more' in civil cases, which is significantly lower than 'beyond a reasonable doubt ' we use for criminal trials.