* Player rolls a 1
GM: "You experience bij."
Edit: You'd think I'd know to check what autocorrect does to what I type by now.
* Player rolls a 1
GM: "You experience bij."
Edit: You'd think I'd know to check what autocorrect does to what I type by now.
They're in the upper right corner
I'm not sure why you're pulling drinking straws and shopping bags into this. The move away from plastic straws and bags has nothing to do with arguments around carbon. That's all about sea life, microplastics, and single use plastics.
You're just injecting "Fuck the turtles in particular" into this for seemingly no reason at all.
Funny, I thought the Red River drained into Fargo.
Yeah, I'm wounded by the ~~commission~~ omission of Cape Breton. But I think it's just that there's nothing dubious about our islands.
Edit: Sausage fingers and rogue autocorrect.
So this is what became of Barth after YCDTOTV went off the air.
People spending more time with fewer games is not a reason, in publishers' minds, to reverse course. It's the intended outcome.
Having the same number of people (or near the same number) playing fewer games, and filling those games with monetization features is cheaper and easier to maintain than having a broad and growing library of titles.
Remember, the ideal for publishers is to have one game that everyone plays that has no content outside of a "spend money" button that players hit over and over again. That's the cheapest product they can put out, and it gives them all the money. They're all seeking everything-for-nothing relationships with customers.
He was "forced" to buy because he, uh, signed a contract saying he would. I'm sorry, but "voluntarily signed a purchase agreement" is only "forcing" if you believe people above a certain wealth level can do whatever the fuck they want with impunity.
He could have backed out and paid the fine he agreed to pay in the case he backed out, but he didn't want to do that, either.
He's not being investigated by someone else.
He can't win because he's a fucking idiot.
Being able to identify the characters might help some, but otherwise no. It's a two part capsule episode
Essay Tea, eh!
It's not "deal with" so much as "stop causing them".
This is really good!
One thing that stands out to me on the reverse view - other than the Roger Rabbit tire, of course - is the shame of the roof as you move toward the front. The front view seems to suggest the slope comes down to be almost parallel with the ground, while the reverse view suggests it points up like 20 degrees. I don't know which is ground truth for this model car, but I suspect it comes close to parallel with the ground.
I can see where it looks like you made changes to the front height of the drivers side window. It's possible you went a millimetre too high or so there.
But that's just nitpicking. Again, it's a really great sketch.