So you've seen dept heads, not been one, and that's make you confident is saying how all businesses operate?
The stock price is not just based on speculation, Jesus dude. Your revenue massively impacts stock price, saying it doesn't is just straight stupid.
You seem to be giving a lot of options that on their face make no sense while never having been in a position where you would actually have to understand and manage these things.
Ugh, wrong again. Time is money. People have limited bandwidth and output, you want to get at much output as you can for the salary spend while realizing each person has a finite output. You keep saying things like "time costs nothing" and "quality doesn't matter" which are just completely wrong and if true would upend the industry.
Also I've been in software for just over 20, the last 4 of those as a CTO. Since you seem to keep bringing up your credentials for some reason.
Lol, saying uptime is needed for quality of why software quality sucks? What? Uptime is part of quality, it is not the sole determination of quality. You seem to be purposefully misunderstanding that concept.
Uptime is quality. It's why uptime is in SLAs. A quality product isn't down half the time.
I mean with sweep generalizations like that you'd fit right in with the MAGA crowd, no wonder you like trump lol.
Yah fun things to talk about like "hey, isn't it interesting how you have less medical rights now." Jfc
Without ranked choice voting a third party vote is throwing away a vote.
Lol /iamverysmart
Yes, greedy companies charge more and are making it harder to get things at a responsible price, that's the mildly infuriating bit.
I feel like people have to be purposefully missing the point to make comments like this.
You used to be able to just order pizza and it be a reasonable price. If you have to do research and build out a coupon spreadsheet just to get a responsible price, that's a problem.
I'm setting a new low sure, and you're moving the goal posts. What "well" means is incredibly subjective.
You worked in QA, cool, and I've manage the entire R&D org of a nation wide company, including all of QA.
Your saying that since companies don't invest in it enough it doesn't matter at all? Why do they even invest at all then, if it truly doesn't matter.
Yes a QA can test old features and keep up with new ones. WTF, have you never heard of a regression test suite? And you worked in QA? ok. Maybe acknowledging AQA is an entire field might solve that already solved problem.
You did a whole lot of complaining and non relevant stories but never answered any questions I've been asking you across multiple comments...