MJKee9

Typically, conduct would have to rise to the level of fraud to justify punitives in a contract based dispute. That's a very high hurdle in most jurisdictions. Also, at that point the conduct complained of would likely be based in tort, not contract.

It's intentional.

You can't typically get punitive damages for contract disputes. Also, there is a very real possibility that the contract hasn't been breached by the new owners' actions. It sounds like they used their superior bargaining power to put a lot of questionable yet enforceable provisions in the contract.

Meatball Sub

Your take is so weak. The "yanks" lost the election because of disinformation campaigns and low information voters. By placating fascist political action, all you are is delaying the inevitable decline of civilization. You're a frog sitting in a warming pot complimenting the relaxing pond.

Honestly, this has been a great year for games. The past 5 years have been pretty great.

Well that's chop suey!

That's my philosophy.

The DNC are complicit.

But they have the same juice!

Pobodies nerfect....

Maybe I was giving op too much credit, but I assumed he was directing his demand to Congress.