[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 0 points 3 days ago

Because humans don't also take inspiration from other's work they've heard and unconsciously repeat part of other songs they've heard before, possibly decades ago. Never happens. Never. Humans don't profit from books they've read and apply to their career. Humans don't profit from watching other humans do the thing and then learn to do it themselves.

All AI does is do the same thing but at ridiculous scale and ridiculous speeds. We shouldn't hold progress because capitalism dictates that we shouldn't put people out of jobs. We need to prepare for the future where there is no jobs and AI replaced all of them.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 4 points 3 days ago

Ask your admin to turn it off, or if you're the admin, turn it off.

They really went with the worst possible way to implement this in that it mangles the post to rewrite all images to the image proxy, so it's not giving you a choice. So if you want the original link you have to reprocess it to strip the proxy. It's like when they thought it was a good idea to store the data as HTML encoded, so not-web clients had to try to undo all of it and it's lossy. It should be up to the clients to add the proxy as needed and if desired. Never mangle user data for storage, always reprocess it as needed and cache it if the processing is expensive.

Now you edit a post and your links are rewritten to the proxy, and if you save it again, now you proxy to the proxy. Just like when they applied the HTML processing on save, if you edited a post and saved it again it would become double encoded.

Personally I leave it off, and let Tesseract do it instead when it renders the images. It's the right way to do it. If the user wants a fresh copy because it's a dynamic image, they can do so on demand instead of being forced into it. And it actually works retroactively compared to the Lemmy server only doing it for new posts.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 4 points 4 days ago

This tool is great to see when remote instances will attempt to send activity to you and how far behind you are: https://phiresky.github.io/lemmy-federation-state

There's an exponential backoff, so sometimes it can take hours before you start receiving activity again, so it's nice to know when to expect it.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 2 points 4 days ago

The stability of a distro usually has more to do with API and ABI stability than stability in terms of reliability. And a "stable" system can be unreliable.

That's why RHEL forks are said to be compatible bug for bug. Because you don't know if fixing the bug could have a cascading side effect for somebody's very critical system.

Arch has been nothing but reliable for me. Does it doesn't need fixing sometimes because the config format of some daemon changed, or Python or nodejs got updated and now my project doesn't build? Absolutely not. But for me usually newer versions are better even if it needs some fixing, and I like doing it piecemeal rather than all at once every couple years.

Stable distributions are well loved for servers because you don't want to update 2000 servers and now you're losing millions because your app isn't compatible with the latest Ruby version. You need to be able to reliably install and reinstall the same distro version and the same packages at the same versions over and over. I can't deal with needing a new server up urgently and then get stuck having to fix a bunch of stuff because I got a newer version of something.

I use multiple distros regularly, for different purposes. Although lately Docker has significantly reduced my need for stable distros and lean more on rolling distros as the host.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 1 points 4 days ago

Make Docker depend on the mount. You can simply use systemctl edit docker.service and then

[Unit]
Requires=path-to-your-smb.mount
After=path-to-your-smb.mount

Then it will guarantee it's mounted by the time Docker starts.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 3 points 4 days ago

Ah it's a laptop, I thought it was a desktop motherboard. That is strange, on a laptop I wouldn't expect people to have to mess with the BIOS at all to make VR work, that's usually a desktop thing to make sure rebar is enabled and stuff.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 8 points 4 days ago

They most likely sent you a new board which happens to have an older BIOS on it. I don't think they try to upgrade them at all, they pick a boxed new board from the warehouse and ship it to you. You can probably just upgrade it again, there's no way this one's newer. Also I guess double-check you got the same model of board back, that could also explain the old BIOS.

RMA'd an MSI board for which they released a BIOS update specifically for the bug I encountered which can get the system completely unbootable even with a CMOS reset, and it didn't even come with the updated BIOS either. I imagine they expect it'll eventually get updated through Windows.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 3 points 5 days ago

For me the reason I want a non-smart TV is the software is complete shit and even a Raspberry Pi runs smoother, and I can replace or upgrade the Pi when it becomes too old to be useful instead of the whole TV.

Those will all become dumb TVs over time, and then you're stuck using the crappy software to get to your HDMI input through all the lag even though the software is literally useless.

At least old TVs had ugly as hell but snappy and responsive menus. No waiting 5+ seconds between button presses because the home screen is lagging loading all those ads.

I caved in and got one anyway and I regret it. Manufactured e-waste. The amount of times I have to reboot the damn thing because even my HDMI input starts glitching out is plainly ridiculous.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 18 points 5 days ago

So what's stopping the workers from saying no? If they have labor shortages then the job market should be favorable to the workers as you gotta be the most attractive employer, which would be those that don't abuse that law and overwork their employees. It's not like they can force people to work.

Or just go anywhere else in the EU.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 9 points 5 days ago

On top of everything the others have said, another way this isn't possible reliably is servers that just accept all email and forward it to a catchall address.

Some also have trap addresses where sending email to it will result in putting that address directly into the spam filter and everything coming from it feeds into training the spam filter. I'm an individual, not a company, so all the common IT, HR, support, press, sales, whatever addresses are traps.

When websites force me to enter an email, I enter one of the traps so everything they send me and everyone they share that email with gets the banhammer instantly, and I can track which asshole website did that to me as well.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 12 points 6 days ago

In my first apartment, I had a smoke detector that was mains powered. The wire metals weren't compatible and eventually the wirenuts burned and cut off power to half the room. The smoke detector's wires were all burnt up. It never alarmed unfortunately so I only learned about it when half the room just went dark. That could absolutely have turned into an electrical fire.

Definitely worth getting it checked.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 6 points 6 days ago

It's open-source, people will strip it right out if it happens.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Max_P

joined 1 year ago