Mikelius

joined 1 year ago
[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

This thread has provided genius ideas I somehow never thought of, and I'm totally stealing them for my sites lol.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Friends and I are in the upper 30s and 40s range so not young not old I guess lol. For the family side, I tend to look for all my closer relatives which range in all ages. While there were many many lines that matched our last names, the entries that were a match didn't have the right phone numbers or addresses (so couldn't really validate if they were us or others with the same name). Or it could always be that they were addresses so old that I don't have a record of them to compare to... Considering a large chunk of the data is apparently old, it's possible that could be a reason I didn't see everyone, too? I'll probably go back and dig a little deeper on the family side since I haven't deleted the data yet.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Fair enough, I should have left with the mention of mileage may vary. I checked for some more friends per request since my posting, and out of the 20-30 families I've now checked, only 1 was compromised... But they were also in a couple of previous ones too. But of course, this doesn't mean it's the same case for everyone else.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (11 children)

The news is kind blowing this up bigger than it really is. But I find this as a good thing because I've noticed a few people FINALLY taking the advice I've been giving for years now, and that's to freeze your credit at the big bureaus and some, if not all, of the smaller ones.

That being said, I checked this data dump for my own data as well as a bunch of friends and family. Not a single person I checked was in it... Which is why I'm not finding this breach to be that frightening personally. The ATT breach was way worse. Also Krebs posted on this today... A good read for anyone interested. Main thing I took from it was a large number of these entries belong to people who have passed away already.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Hey this is pretty nice and simple, I like it. Had to hold down on the app to select the settings to change my server, would be nicer if that settings button was within the app itself... But got it pointing to my self-hosted instance and tested it out. Works perfectly! Thanks for sharing

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for clarifying! Took a deeper look on my computer and I guess I learned that NoScript was misidentifying due to the cors or something. Just had to call it out before, as one can never be too careful these days :D

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The security part is the reason I use NoScript to do this. We've all typo squatted sites we visit, I'm sure. But if I typo squat a site I frequently visit and see the JavaScript disabled, it forces me to recheck I'm on the right site. Granted it's only happened once where I didn't realize I typo'd until seeing it was disabled, but it only takes 1 time to lose everything...

Not sure the fingerprint concerns are too major for me either. Hopefully most scenarios, I'm flagged as a bot or crawler and out of some data that would otherwise have been collected. Who knows. I imagine that JavaScript makes up for way more fingerprinting though.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I use iperf3 with Speedtest's servers, personally. But for a browser, yes JavaScript is needed.... But needing JavaScript files from like 20 different domains is typically a red flag for me on any site.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

My solution to this question a year or so ago was to take my gaming desktop, which was collecting dust after I moved to my gaming laptop, and gut it down to a 4U server rack case. Best decision I've ever made. 12 core Ryzen and 128gb memory. Got a 10g adapter in the pci express, 8xHDD for data and then 2 mirrored nvme for the OS itself. Only thing I kept out was the video card since I had no use for it (yet)

An equivalent "server" on the market would probably cost a fortune and cost you a ridiculous amount of electricity.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 month ago (10 children)

The NoScript list terrifies me a little though... Not sure what's going on there, but that's a lot of JavaScript lol.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've been doing this for a while now with opnsense being what masks the whole network behind the mullvad VPN.

Pros:

  • Even fresh new devices that have all that crap junkware installed get routed through the VPN, meaning no tracking to you immediately (unless they sniff the rest of the network and relay your network AP I guess)
  • one device instead of many, leaving extra devices available to use for a single mullvad account (limited to 5 devices, at least for wireguard)
  • if using wireguard, you honestly won't be hit with network performance issues. Just don't choose a server across the world from you. I chose one in the same country as myself and get an average 95-97% of my internet speed, and that's because I also have IDS/IPS enabled

Cons:

  • as others mentioned, increase captcha annoyances
  • some banks may lock your account if you try to log in with the VPN
  • if the VPN server goes down, the whole network will. This may be a good thing since your don't want traffic to leak, but just pointing out you now have another single point of failure outside your ISP
  • when someone's hoarding the entire VPN server you're connected to, you'll probably witness a slowdown

That all being said, if you're not very technically savvy on the networking side or haven't ever setup a custom router/firewall, this will be a pain. But it you want to learn something new and are up for the challenge, eventually it gets down to almost never having to worry about it. I've been doing it for a long time now, so for me personally, I've gotten to the point of only needing to login to the firewall for a VPN setting update or server change maybe once a month

view more: ‹ prev next ›