Mondez

joined 1 month ago
[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's worth noting that distinct lineages only really happen where there is reproductive isolation and that especially in the modern world no one has a "pure" lineage. Instead you have genetic composition that might have a larger influence from one ancestral population over an other.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn't Anna's Archive mirror libgen amongst other things?

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 2 points 1 month ago

But there are games that have the same problems today, they just look better because they have higher resolution assets but as still riddled with bugs and control issues.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago

Maximising their return on investment presumably figuring that the increased fee will bring in more money despite some customers cancelling.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago

You are right my argument was predicated on the price rise being justified by piracy not the cause of it. If they don't like ESPNs pricing model can't they license their content elsewhere?

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Better by which objective metric? Amount of content? Total size of game code and data? Got to disagree with you otherwise.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'd argue that is true of any generation, a few games are must plays and endure as such, then there are many that are just okay even at the time and then a bunch of crap it's hardly worth playing.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yeah, that isn't how economics work, they increased the price because they believe it will be a more profitable price point. I guess they could argue they lost the price sensitive customers to piracy and are just giving up on that segment and focusing on the people who just pay whatever?

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tell that to console manufacturers. Or Apple for that matter.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Technicality of usage rights is very relevant, framing as a purchase where it actually isn't is dishonest and the fact that they make more money being dishonest doesn't make it right. Other than that you used an awful lot of words to basically agree with me.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No, no ownership is being conferred except to a number, the supporters club key let's call it. That is what you are buying, it's like an NFT. And just like NFTs it's being marketed as though you are purchasing the work itself which you absolutely are not doing. You are paying for the right to say you paid.

If you don't pay you are in exactly the same state as if you paid regarding your license to use the software, it's licensed to you under the terms of the agplv3. If they were selling a support contract that would be fine too, but again, no, you get no extra support over what anyone posting a issue on the tracker will get. Even if it were a support contract then it should be made clear that is what you buy.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Buying confers ownership of something even if it's just a legal agreement like a software license. No ownership over immich is being conferred, nothing is being conveyed to anyone so it's incorrect to term it a purchase, much less a purchase of immich.

view more: ‹ prev next ›