They try to make it equivalent so they can classify people who smash windows in protest as "violent criminals" in order to increase the penalties which is a complete mischaracterization. If the act of vandalism has knock on effects then those are separate from the act itself and should be dealt with separately.
MooseyMoose
joined 3 days ago
Then your act of vandalism/sabotage would have effects that harms people. Is this so difficult for you to understand? SMH.
My brother was a sociopath, unsuccessful in business but a user and abuser.
Yeah I got called a bootlicker because of saying that business as usual was far better than the unmitigated disaster we are facing now. I hate being proven right.
A business man who has failed to sell: Booze, football, and steaks...TO AMERICANS.
There ain't no smile in those eyes. Creepy AF.
If you actually read the words of the Buddha on reincarnation he was quite explicitly clear that he never endorsed the idea.
I don't consider property destruction "violence". Violence for me can only occur if there is a nervous system involved. Defining it otherwise seems a bit disingenuous, imo. Vandalism is not the same as an act against a person or animal.
Yeah they are an organized theocracy that regularly abused their power and children through history and exploited the peasants. It's my own personal term for them since the parallels are too hard to ignore.
Property damage is not violence against civilians.
view more: next ›
I understand, my brother only ever fucked over everyone else except me (probably because he knew what would happen) and it was an ever frustrating thing. I miss him but I think it's for the best that he isn't around to do more damage.